SECAUCUS, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: NIKKO CERAMICS INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NIKKO CERAMICS INC. in 114 SEVIEW DRIVE, SECAUCUS, NJ 07094 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 302133442.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NIKKO CERAMICS INC.
- Site address
- 114 SEVIEW DRIVE
- City
- SECAUCUS
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07094
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4225
- Employees
- 26
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 11, 1999
- Abate by
- Jun 16, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $525 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employmnent and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to being crushed by forklift trucks in the event of a rollover: a)Throughout the Warehouse Area: Employees who operate forklift trucks were not required to wear protective restraint devices (seatbelts) that were equipped on Powered Industrial Trucks and required by manufactures specifications. Observed on or about 6/2/99. a)Throughout the Warehouse: ABATEMENT NOTE:AMONG OTHER MEANS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE METHOD TO CORRECT THIS HAZARD WOULD BE FOR THE COMPANY TO REQUIRE EMPLOYEES TO UTILIZE THE SEATBELTS AND REFRESH THE EMPLOYEES ABOUT WEARING SEATBELTS.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $525.00
- · Z (S) $700.00
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jun 11, 1999
- Abate by
- Jul 14, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $392 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $391.50
- · Z (S) $525.00
1910.178 M07
- Issued
- Jun 11, 1999
- Abate by
- Jun 16, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $525 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $525.00
- · Z (S) $700.00
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Jun 11, 1999
- Abate by
- Jul 14, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $392 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $391.50
- · Z (S) $525.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Jun 11, 1999
- Abate by
- Jun 16, 1999
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 302133442.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.