Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: LITCHFIELD FABRICS OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LITCHFIELD FABRICS OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. in 215 BULB STREET, GASTONIA, NC 28052 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 302238779.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Litchfield Fabrics of North Carolina, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Litchfield Fabrics of North Carolina, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
215 BULB STREET
City
GASTONIA
State
NC
ZIP
28052
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
2258
Employees
65
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

22 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999
Penalty
Initial $525 · Current $525
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to
each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of
employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)facility; staging - the monorail system has not been load
tested.
Reference:  ANSI 30.11-1980; paragraph 11-2.2.2 (a)
"Prior to initial use, all new, extensively repaired, and
altered equipment should be tested and inspected by, or
under the direction of, an appointed or authorized
person, and a written report should be furnished by such
person..."
NOTE: Among other methods, one feasible and accepted
method to correct this hazard is to have the monorail
system load tested

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999
Penalty
Initial $263 · Current $263
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to
each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of
employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)facility; staging - no frequent or periodic inspections
have been performed for monorail system.
Reference: ANSI B30.11 - 1980; paragraph 11-2.1.1 (a)
"Prior to initial use, all new, altered, modified, or
extensively repaired cranes and monorail systems shall be
inspected...as per (b) inspections conducted on frequent
and periodic basis."
NOTE:  Among other methods, one feasible and
acceptable method to correct this hazard is to
conduct frequent and periodic inspections on
the monorail system.l

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999
Penalty
Initial $263 · Current $263
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to
each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of
employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)facility; staging - no frequent or periodic inspections
have been performed for below the hook lifting device
Reference: ANSI B30.20 - 1985; paragraph 20-1.3.1 (a)
"Prior to initial use, all new, altered, modified, or
repaired lifting devices  shall be inspected...as per (b)
inspections conducted on frequent and periodic basis."
NOTE:  Among other methods, one feasible and
acceptable method to correct this hazard is to
conduct frequent and periodic inspections on
the below the hook lifting deviceg

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999
Penalty
Initial $263 · Current $263
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to
each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of
employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)facility; staging - below the hook lifting device used on
monorail system has not been load tested
Reference: ANSI B30.20 - 1985; paragraph 20-1.4.2 (a)
"Prior to initial use, all new, altered, modified, or
repaired lifting devices  should be tested and inspected
by or under the direction of a qualified person and a
written report must be furnished by such a person.."
NOTE:  Among other methods, one feasible and
acceptable method to correct this hazard is to
conduct a load test
on the below the hook lifting device.

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999
Penalty
Initial $113 · Current $113
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to
each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of
employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)facility; staging - there was no rated load marking on
the monorail system
Reference: ANSI B30.11 - 1980; paragraph 11-1.1.1 (a)
"The rated load of the crane shall be marked on the
crane..."
NOTE:  Among other methods, one feasible and
acceptable method to correct this hazard is to
provide rated load markings on the monorail

1910.184 I09 III

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999
Penalty
Initial $263 · Current $263

1910.215 B09

Serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999
Penalty
Initial $375 · Current $375

1910.215 A04

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999

1910.305 G02 II

Serious 6 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999
Penalty
Initial $188 · Current $188

1910.178 A04

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999
Penalty
Initial $263 · Current $263

1910.22 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999

1910.23 D01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999

1910.37 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999

1910.38 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999

1910.101 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999

1910.305 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999

1910.305 B02

Other-than-serious 4 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999

1910.305 G01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999

1910.305 G02 III

Other-than-serious 6 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999

1910.219 F03

Other-than-serious 10 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 1999
Abate by
Feb 4, 1999

View Litchfield Fabrics of North Carolina, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 302238779.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.