Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HAYS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HAYS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. in 3700 HIGHLANDS RANCH PARKWAY, HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80126 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 302306436.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hays Construction CO., INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hays Construction CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3700 HIGHLANDS RANCH PARKWAY
City
HIGHLANDS RANCH
State
CO
ZIP
80126
Mailing
7800 S. ELATI, SUITE 205, LITTLETON, CO 80120
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
1542
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 20, 1998
Abate by
Nov 25, 1998
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to: Fall hazards while working from an elevated work platform
installing trusses
on the north side of a future Chick-Fil-A restaurant.  The work platform,
elevated to a height
of over 8 feet and supported by a Lull 644B-37 forklift, had not been
designed to protect
employees from falls.  Restraining devices such as railings, chains,
cables, or personal fall arrest
systems were not installed or in use.  No means of fall protection was
provided to protect
employees from falls.
Among other feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this
hazard are (1) Provide
employees with scaffolding utilized in conjunction with acceptable fall
protection equipment, (2)
Utilize machinery designed for the purpose of hoisting personnel.
Abatement Note:  Abatement certification is not required for this item.
Abatement was
observed by the CSHO during the inspection.on

1926.25 A

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 20, 1998
Abate by
Nov 25, 1998
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $450

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 20, 1998
Abate by
Nov 25, 1998
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $450

1926.451 C02 IV

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 20, 1998
Abate by
Nov 25, 1998

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 302306436.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.