CONROE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ALLIANT FOODSERVICE
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ALLIANT FOODSERVICE in 10 S. TRADE CENTER PARKWAY, CONROE, TX 77385 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 302571674.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALLIANT FOODSERVICE
- Site address
- 10 S. TRADE CENTER PARKWAY
- City
- CONROE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77385
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 5143
- Employees
- 179
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2000
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $4,500
General-duty citation text
b. Freezer Area Selectors: i) Redesign the warehouse storage rack system and the pallet jack so that heavy objects are located at an optimum lifting height which minimizes torso flexion and overhead reaches. Optimal height is between chest and thigh level. Recommendations to achieve these optimal heights include: 1) Utilizing additional pallets as spaces to elevate the load; 2) Utilize palletizers in the bins Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The of the racking system as well as on pallet jacks; 3) Utilize elevated carts pulled by tugs instead of pallet jacks; 4) Provide additional horizontal rack cross members to raise the bottom pallets off of the ground ii) Develop a ranking system to identify storage areas which require hazardous lifting tasks. The ranking system should identify heavy and bulky objects stored at low locations as the most hazardous and light compact objects as least employer did not hazardous. The storage locations of the most hazardous lifting tasks should furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the following hazardous ergonomic conditions: a. Dry/Refrigerated Area Selectors (19 Employees): Evaluation of this task indicates that employees are exposed to the ergonomic stressors of repetitive be clearly identified to stocking and picking employees. An operation procedure should be developed to provide reorientation of those items identified as creating the most hazardous lifting tasks. These locations should have the pallet turned and/or elevated as needed to maintain optimum lifting postures. iii) Modify the bins at the end of the aisles so items can be accessed lifting of packaged from the front and the side. Move the stabilizing cross member so employees can enter the bin from the side as well as the front. This modification will enable employees to obtain heavy items from two sides and allow the load to be lifted and maintained close to the body. Employees should have access to all sides of the pallet eliminating excessive reaches to pull and/or lift objects toward the goods weighing up to or in excess of 60 pounds. Employees must repeatedly body. iv) Install a track system which will allow the entire pallet of product to reach forward, bend at the waist, and twist the torso to obtain the product from palletized supply located under over head racking. Racking design requires lifts to be performed with the torso bent and the load held out and away from the body. A calculation of these lifting tasks utilizing the NIOSH Lifting Guide Allowable Limits (1991) be pulled out of the bin. This modification will permit the pallet to be accessed from all sides and allow the load to be lifted and maintained close to the body, eliminating the need for extended reaches and torso flexion. The addition of a turntable will permit the rotation of the pallet 180 degrees, allowing placement indicates that the back into the bin with the items previously in the back now easily accessible from the front. v) Install a platform having casters or wheels that palletized product can be placed onto. This modification will permit the pallet to be pulled out from the bin providing access from all sides, allowing the load to be lifted and maintained close to the body, and eliminating the need for extended reaches and torso NIOSH Recommended Weight Limit for this task is consistently exceeded. flexion. THE wheels will permit the rotation of the pallet 180 degrees, allowing it to be placed back into the bin with the items previously in the back now These easily accessible from the front. vi) Provide a long handled tool to pull product closer to the front edge of the rack opening before it is lifted. vii) Educate the employees on the basics of body biomechanics and the importance of maintaining the body in an ergonomically neutral position. Torso flexion should be limited to no more than 6 to 10 degrees from vertical. Maximum reach distances of 16 to 18 inches forward are recommended and the arms should be maintained in front of the body at all times minimizing reaches out to the sides. The hands should not be elevated above shoulder height and the load should be maintained at waist level. Employees should be trained on the hazards of repetitive torso flexion and reaches and made aware that the weight and positioning of an item is important to their safety. The load should be maintained close to the body and the feet rotated, turning the entire body,eliminating twisting of the torso. Employees should not lift multiple items raising the weight of the load to unacceptable levels, or reach to distant locations to access product and/or reach with a load in the hands to place product on a pallet. III. MEDICAL MANAGEMENT which includes accurate record keeping of ergonomic illness cases. The program shall address early recognition, evaluation and referral of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) cases, and should include conservative treatment and conservative return to work, including work hardening prior to return to full duty. The medical management program is to be established under the supervision of a physician or occupational health nurse (OHN) with training in the prevention and treatment of MSDs. Systematic work site review by the medical practitioners shall also be included in the program. Discrimination against employees for reporting or incurring a MSD shall be prohibited. The program shall include, but is not limited to, the following elements in order to prevent and/or limit t he severity and exacerbation of MSDS: a) Qualified health care providers shall be trained in the early recognition, evaluation, treatment, rehabilitation, and prevention of Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDSs), OSHA record keeping requirements, and physical assessment of employees. b)Health care providers shall perform a periodic workplace walk through which ill allow the identification of potential light duty jobs, and the direct observation of individual work practices in order to remain knowledgeable about operations described by employees. These walk through's shall be documented and conducted when new jobs are established and/or as existing jobs change. Appropriate assignments to light duty jobs will be made and tracking of employees shall be performed to assure that an employee's medical condition is not aggravated or exacerbated. c) A written job analysis describing the ergonomic hazards found on each job shall be developed and made available to the health care providers. The health department shall provide input to the development of the job analysis. Periodic review and revision of the ergonomic job analysis shall be conducted for all existing jobs, for all new jobs and whenever existing jobs are modified. d) Surveillance shall be performed in order to identify jobs needing intervention to eliminate ergonomic hazards. Surveillance shall be both passive, either by reviewing data such as illness records, and/or active, through administration of an employee symptom survey. HEAlth care providers will provide input in this surveillance to identify high risk departments, production lines, and/or jobs. e) An evaluation shall be done to identify individuals with any sign or symptoms of MSDs allowing early treatment to limit the conditions' severity. The health care provider should perform an MSD evaluation of employees assigned to jobs with known ergonomic hazards or area found to have MSD problems by surveillance. The MSD evaluation shall include inspection, palpation, range of motion (active, passive, andresisted), and other pertinent maneuvers of the upper extremities and back. Such evaluations shall be documented. f) Evaluations and treatment of employees with complaints consistent with MSDs shall be based on protocols shall be documented in writing, reviewed and updated by a knowledgeable party, usually a physician, on an annual basis. Conservative medical treatment shall be followed for initial symptoms and signs in order to prevent increased morbidity of cases. If initial treatment of the MSD has not resulted in prompt improvement or resolution of the signs of symptoms, the employee shall be taken off the job causing the problem, or place on restrictions by the health care provider. The restricted employee will be place on appropriate jobs, consistent with their capability, which do not pose parallel stressors, by health care providers familiar with the job requirements. Symptomatic employees shall be followed up to determine the effectiveness of the prescribed treatment. Employees with severe symptoms, positive physical findings, disorders, or signs resistant to treatment shall be immediately referred to physician for further evaluation. In no event shall employees with signs of symptoms undergo conservative treatment for longer than two weeks without first being referred to a physician for evaluation. Conservative therapy and time away from the job causing the problem deserves and adequate trial before surgical intervention is contemplated. Recommendations for surgery should be referred for a second opinion to a physician other than a surgeon. Appropriate amount of time off work after surgery shall be assured. A physical evaluation of the worker after time away from work, to assess work capabilities should be performed to ensure appropriate job replacement upon return to work. If the employee is being medically followed for MSDs, the medical department shall review the ergonomic analysis of the job causing the problems. If a job has no ergonomic analysis available, the job will be analyzed for ergonomic stressors. g) The health care provider shall be responsible for entering the appropriate information onto the OSHA forms and should be adequately trained on OSHA's record keeping requirements. Health care providers shall ensure the appropriate documentation of medical treatment (including self-administered treatment) and the retention of such documents. h) Evaluation of the medical management program should be performed on aperiodic basis to assure effectiveness of all of the elements. A formal documented tracking and surveillance program to monitor musculoskeletal disorder trends in the plant and to follow those employees being treated for MSDs shall be instituted. IV. TRAINING AND EDUCATION for employees. Training should address the hazards associated with the job, the risk factors which cause musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), and how ergonomic stressors are causing or are likely to cause cumulative trauma to prevent the occurrence of MSDs including the use of engineering and administrative controls and their maintenance. retraining should be performed at least annually and/or as operationschange. Supervisors who have the day to day responsibility for monitoring and enforcing the companies ergonomics program should receive additional training sufficient to assure competency in the oversight of the program and control measures within their areas of responsibility. Methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the training disorders to the shall be developed and implemented. back, shoulder, lower extremities, and/or upper extremities as evidenced by a review of the company's injury and illness records from 1997 to the time of inspection, which document that a significant number of musculoskeletal disorders have been caused by exposure to these stressors. b. Freezer Area Selectors (3 Employees): Evaluation of this task ABATEMENT OF THE CITATION SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE: STEP I:SUBMIT TO THE AREA DIRECTOR IN WRITING A DETAILED PLAN, INCLUDING A TIME TABLE, ON HOW ABATEMENT METHODS I, II, AND IV OUTLINED ABOVE WILL BE INIIATED AND/OR EVALUATED. DATE DUE:08/21/00 STEP II:SUBMIT TO THE AREA DIRECTOR A WRITTEN, DETAILED PLAN OF ABATEMENT OUTLINING A SCHEDULE FOR THE indicates that IMPLEMENTATION OF ENGINEERING AND/OR ADMINISTRATIVE MEASURES TO REDUCE ERGONOMIC RISK FACTORS OF STRESSORS THAT HAD CAUSED OR WERE LIKELY TO CAUSE MUSCULOSKELETAL INJURIES AS REFERENCED IN THIS CITATION. THIS PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM, TARGET DATES FOR THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS WHICH MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ABATEMENT DATES REQUIRED BY THIS CITATION: employees are exposed to the ergonomic stressors of repetitive lifting of packaged goods weighing up to, or in excess of 60 pounds. Employees must repeatedly reach forward, bend at the waist, and twist the torso to obtain the product from palletized supply located under over head racking. Racking design requires lifts to be performed with the torso bent and the load held out and away from the body. A calculation of these (1) EVALUATION OF ENGINEERING /ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS OPTIONS; (2) SELECTION OF OPTIMUM CONTROL METHODS AND COMPLETION OF DESIGN; (3) PROCUREMENT, INSTALLATION, AND OPERATION OF SELECTED CONTROL MEASURES; AND (4) TESTING AND ACCEPTANCE OR MODIFICATION- REDESIGN OF CONTROLS. All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use lifting tasks by an ergonomist, industrial hygienist, or other technically qualified person. 30-day progress reports are required during the abatement period. * NOTE- The 30 day requirement for the submission of progress reports may be lengthened or shortened depending on the length of the overall abatement period. Monitoring inspections could also be scheduled, if so desired by the AREA DIRECTOR. DATE DUE:09/12/00 STEP III:SUBMIT TO THE AREA DIRECTOR IN WRITING ACTION TAKEN SHOWING REDUCTION IN MUSCULOSKETAL INJURIES. 90 DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD. DATE DUE:09/12/00 12/16/00 03/13/00 STEP IV:ABATEMENT SHALL HAVE BEEN COMPLETED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FEASIBLE ENGINEERING CONTROLS AND/OR ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS UPON VERIFICATION OF THEIR EFFECTIVENESS IN ACHIEVING COMPLIANCE. DATE DUE:03/13/01 *** Certification and Documentation of Abatement Required *** utilizing the NIOSH Lifting Guide Allowable Limits (1991) indicates that the NIOSH Recommended Weight Limit for this task is consistently exceeded. These ergonomic stressors are causing or are likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders to the back, shoulder, lower extremities, and/or lower extremities as evidenced by a review of the company's injury and illness records from 1997 to the time of inspection, which document that a significant number of musculoskeletal disorders have been caused by exposure to these stressors. ABATEMENT METHODS Feasible means to correct these hazards include continuing the development and implementation of a comprehensive written ergonomics management program, monitored by a qualified professional trained in ergonomics, and a comprehensive medical management program monitored by a qualified health care provider, which utilizes the following elements: I. WORK SITE ANALYSIS to recognize and identify existing ergonomic illness checklists and employee questionnaires. Frequent surveys of the workplace shall be conducted by a qualified professional trained in ergonomics to identify and evaluate ergonomic stressors and the work practices and engineering controls needed for their abatement. The survey shall include a job analysis of all high risk, restricted duty, and other jobs used within an administrative controlscheme. The job analysis shall specifically identify all ergonomic stressor and the body part affected. Employees on restrictive duty shall not be placed on jobs where conditions exist that could re-injure body parts being protected by a restricted duty assignment or on jobs which when performed with restricted capacity place excessive strain on another body part. Employee participation in the program should be encouraged through a mechanism such as a safety committee. II. HAZARD PREVENTION AND CONTROL which includes the development and use of engineering, work practice and administrative control measures, and personal protective equipment, where deemed relevant. 1) Engineering controls are to be designed by a qualified professional trained in ergonomics and may include work station redesign, tool redesign, and changes in work methods. The goal of this program is to make the task fit the person. Examples of control measures applicable to the cited work tasks listed above may include but are not limited to the following: a. Dry/Refrigerated Area Selectors: i) Redesign the warehouse storage rack system and the pallet jack so that heavy objects are located at an optimum lifting height which minimizes torso flexion and overhead reaches. Optimal height is between chest and thigh level. Recommendations to achieve these optimal heights include: 1) Utilizing additional pallets as spaces to elevate the load; 2) Utilize palletizers in the bins of the racking system as well as on pallet jacks; 3) Utilize elevated carts pulled by tugs instead of pallet jacks; 4) Provide additional horizontal rack cross members to raise the bottom pallets off of the ground ii) Limit the weight of items handled manually through cooperative efforts with suppliers or through in-house techniques. Ideally, manually handled items should weigh no more than about 40 pounds. iii) Develop a ranking system to identify storage areas which require hazardous lifting tasks. The ranking system should identify heavy and bulky objects stored at low locations as the most hazardous and light compact objects as least hazardous. The storage locations of the most hazardous lifting tasks should be clearly identified to stocking and picking employees. An operation procedure should be developed to provide reorientation of those items identified as creating the most hazardous lifting tasks. These locations should have the pallet turned and/or elevated as needed to maintain optimum lifting postures. iv) Modify the bins at the end of the aisles so items can be accessed from the front and the side. Move the stabilizing cross member so employees can enter the bin from the side as well as the front. This modification will enable employees to obtain heavy items from two sides and allow the load to be lifted and maintained close to the body. Employees should have access to all sides ofthe pallet eliminating excessive reaches to pull and/or lift objects toward the body. v) Install a track system which will allow the entire pallet of product to be pulled out of the bin. This modification will permit the pallet to be accessed from all sides and allow the load to be lifted and maintained close to the body, eliminating the need for extended reaches and torso flexion. The addition of a turntable will permit the rotation of the pallet 180 degrees, allowing placement back into the bin with the items previously in the back now easily accessible from the front. vi) Install a platform having casters or wheels that palletized product can be placed onto. This modification will permit the pallet to be pulled out from the bin providing access from all sides, allowing the load to be lifted and maintained close to the body, and eliminating the need for extended reaches and torso flexion. THE wheels will permit the rotation of the pallet 180 degrees, allowing it to be placed back into the bin with the items previously in the back now easily accessible from the front. vii) Provide a long handled tool to pull product closer to the front edge of the rack opening before it is lifted. viii) Educate the employees on the basics of body biomechanics and the importance of maintaining the body in an ergonomically neutral position. Torso flexion should be limited to no more than 6 to 10 degrees from vertical. Maximum reach distances of 16 to 18 inches forward are recommended and the arms should be maintained in front of the body at all times minimizing reaches out to the sides. The hands should not be elevated above shoulder height and the load should be maintained at waist level. Employees should be trained on the hazards of repetitive torso flexion and reaches and made aware that the weight and positioning of an item is important to their safety. The load should be maintained close to the body and the feet rotated, turning the entire body, eliminating twisting of the torso. Employees should not lift multiple items raising the weight of the load to unacceptable levels, or reach to distant locations to access product and/or reach with a load in the hands to place product on a pallet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4500.00
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2000
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $1,350 · Current $750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $750.00
- — Z (S) $1350.00
1910.26 C02 VII
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2000
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $1,350 · Current $750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $750.00
- — Z (S) $1350.00
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2000
- Abate by
- Jun 26, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $2,250 · Current $1,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $2250.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2000
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 2000
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Alliant Foodservice
View Alliant Foodservice's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 302571674.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.