Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: COMPONENT REMANUFACTURING SPECIALISTS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of COMPONENT REMANUFACTURING SPECIALISTS, INC. in 1224 ISLEY ROAD, GASTONIA, NC 28053 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 302650494.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Component Remanufacturing Specialists, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Component Remanufacturing Specialists, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1224 ISLEY ROAD
City
GASTONIA
State
NC
ZIP
28053
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
3714
Employees
280
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

19 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Serious 20 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 17, 1999
Penalty
Initial $963 · Current $530 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to
each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of
employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)facility; 4160 final test - 14 Aro hoists monorail
systems have not been load tested.
b) facility; Boxing - Aro 1/2 ton hoist floor mounted jib
crane has not been load tested.
c) facility; 4T65E final test - Aro 1/2 ton hoist floor
mounted jib crane has not been load tested.
d) facility; Load line disassembly - Aro 1/2 ton hoist floor
mounted jib crane has not been load tested.
e) facility; Car test - 2 - 1/2 ton Aro hoists monorail
systems have not been load tested.
f) facility; Spray paint booth - 300 pound Aro hoist
monorail system has not been load tested.
g) facility; Case Prep -  Aro 1/2 ton hoist floor mounted
jib crane has not been load tested.
Reference: ANSI B30.11 - 1980; paragraph 11-2.2.2.(a) Rated
Load test - Prior to initial use, all new, extensively
repaired, and altered equipment should be tested...
NOTE: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable methods
to correct this hazard is to have all cranes load tested.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $529.65
  • · Z (S) $963.00

95012901

Serious 20 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 17, 1999
Penalty
Initial $688 · Current $378 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to
each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of
employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a) facility; 4160 final test - 14 Aro hoists monorail
systems have not been periodically inspected.
b) facility; boxing - Aro 1/2 ton hoist floor mounted jib
crane has not been periodically inspected.
c) facility; 4T65E final test - Aro 1/2 ton hoist floor
mounted jib crane has not been periodically inspected.
d) facility; load line disassembly - Aro 1/2 ton hoist floor
mounted jib crane has not been periodically inspected.
e) facility; car test - 2 - 1/2 ton Aro hoists monorail
systems have not been periodically inspected.
f) facility; spray paint booth - 300 pound Aro hoist
monorail system has not been periodically inspected.
g) facility; case prep -  Aro 1/2 ton hoist floor mounted
jib crane has not been periodically inspected.
Reference: ANSI B30.11 - 1980; paragraph 11-2.1.1.(a) Initial
inspection - Prior to initial use, all new, altered, modified,
or extensively repaired cranes and monorail systems shall be
inspected...
NOTE: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable methods
to correct this hazard is to have all cranes periodically
inspected.ly
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $378.40
  • · Z (S) $688.00

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 6, 1999
Penalty
Initial $963 · Current $530 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to
each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of
employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)facility; bay 2 storage area - forklift operator was
observed not wearing seat belt
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $529.65
  • · Z (S) $963.00

1910.107 E02

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 6, 1999
Penalty
Initial $688 · Current $378 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $378.40
  • · Z (S) $688.00

1910.107 B05 IV

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 6, 1999

1910.107 B09

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 6, 1999

1910.212 A03 II

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 6, 1999
Penalty
Initial $688 · Current $378 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $378.40
  • · Z (S) $688.00

1910.215 B09

Serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 6, 1999
Penalty
Initial $1,375 · Current $756 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $756.25
  • · Z (S) $1375.00

1910.215 A02

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 6, 1999

1910.215 A04

Serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 6, 1999

1910.304 F04

Serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 6, 1999
Penalty
Initial $963 · Current $530 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $529.65
  • · Z (S) $963.00

1910.23 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 6, 1999

1910.23 D01 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 6, 1999

1910.147 C04 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 6, 1999

1910.242 B

Other-than-serious 4 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 6, 1999

1910.303 F

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 6, 1999

1910.305 B01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 6, 1999

1910.133 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 6, 1999

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 1999
Abate by
May 6, 1999

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 302650494.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.