Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: 702 SALINA AUTO CENTER, LTD DBA MIDAS AUTO SYSTEMS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of 702 SALINA AUTO CENTER, LTD DBA MIDAS AUTO SYSTEMS in 3902 SOUTH SALINA ST., SYRACUSE, NY 13205 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 302688072.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch 702 Salina Auto Center, LTD DBA Midas Auto Systems for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for 702 Salina Auto Center, LTD DBA Midas Auto Systems is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3902 SOUTH SALINA ST.
City
SYRACUSE
State
NY
ZIP
13205
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
7533
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 8 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 1999
Abate by
Aug 30, 1999
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to a crushing hazard created by the sudden and unpredictable
descent of vehicles
elevated by automotive lifts:
a)In the shop, Bay 1, on or about 7/22/99:  VBM surface-mounted automotive
lift, no periodic inspections were conducted on the lift, exposing
employees
to being struck by the vehicle should the lift fail.
b)In the shop, Bay 2, on or about 7/22/99:  VBM surface-mounted automotive
lift, three of the contact pads on the arms could not be adjusted and no
periodic inspections were conducted on the lift, exposing employees to
being
struck by the vehicle should the lift fail.
c)In the shop, Bay 3, on or about 7/22/99:  Forward Surface 8000A surface-
mounted automotive lift, no periodic inspections were conducted on the
lift,
exposing employees to being struck by the vehicle should the lift fail.
d)In the shop, Bay 4, on or about 7/22/99:  Globe two piston automotive
lift,
had no functional locking devices, had hydraulic leaks, there were no
markings on the lift indicating manufacturer's name, rated load capacity,
model and serial number, and no periodic inspections were conducted on the
lift, exposing employees to being struck by the vehicle should the lift
fail.
e)In the shop, Bay 5, on or about 7/22/99:  Globe two piston automotive
lift,
had no functional locking devices, had hydraulic leaks, there were no
markings on the lift indicating manufacturer's name, rated load capacity,
model and serial number, and no periodic inspections were conducted on the
lift, exposing employees to being struck by the vehicle should the lift
fail.
f)In the shop, Bay 6, on or about 7/22/99:  Surface-mounted automotive
lift,
no periodic inspections were conducted on the lift, exposing employees to
being struck by the vehicle should the lift fail.
g)In the shop, Truck Bay, south end, on or about 7/22/99:  Axle-engaging
two
piston lift had no functional locking devices, had hydraulic leaks, the
floor
lift control mechanisms were loose, damaged and not aligning properly with
the pin devices below the floor, had no markings on the lift indicating
manufacturer's name, rated load capacity, model and serial number and no
periodic inspections were conducted on the lift, exposing employees the
being
struck by the vehicle should the lift fail.
h)In the shop, Truck Bay, north end, on or about 7/22/99:  Axle-engaging
two
piston lift had no functional locking devices, had hydraulic leaks, the
floor
lift control mechanisms were loose, damaged and not aligning properly
withthe pin devices below the floor, had no markings on the lift
indicating the
manufacturer's name, rated load capacity, model and serial number and no
periodic inspections were conducted on the lift, exposing employees to
being
struck by the vehicle should the lift fail.
Among other methods, several feasible and acceptable abatement methods to
correct
these hazards are to:
1.Install and/or repair mechanical locking devices.
2.Repair hydraulic leaks.
3.Repair floor lift control mechanisms.
4.Install permanent markings on the lifts to show the manufacturer's name,
rated load capacity, model and serial number.
5.Establish a periodic inspection procedure as recommended by the
manufacturer to ensure the safe operation of the lift.
6.Instruct all employees in the safe use and operation of the automotive
lifts
and their safety devices and ensure their routine use.
Abatement documentation must be submitted for this item.

1910.22 C

Serious Gravity 03 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 1999
Abate by
Aug 30, 1999

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 302688072.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.