Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: GANES CHEMICAL

Accident-driven inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven health inspection of GANES CHEMICAL in 33 INDUSTRIAL PARK RD, PENNSVILLE, NJ 08070 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 302714340.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ganes Chemical for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ganes Chemical is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GANES CHEMICAL
Site address
33 INDUSTRIAL PARK RD
City
PENNSVILLE
State
NJ
ZIP
08070
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (Y)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
2834
Employees
192
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2000
Abate by
Oct 30, 2000
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to: a flash fire which occurred while the employees were
loading a drier with a
material that contained heptane.
a). Establishment (BLDG 1) - Employees who were loading a drier with a
product which
contained heptane, were exposed to a flash fire and received severe burns
when the
heptane vapors ignited. Engineering controls and work practices were not
sufficient to
prevent a flash fire from starting inside the drier, (re: NFPA 77, Static
Electricity, Chap.
2).
A feasible method of abatement includes, but is not limited to; 1)
Installation of an
independent measure of the nitrogen blanket in the drier to ensure the
oxygen
level is
below that which will support combustion. 2). Investigate alternate means
and methods
of intermediate product packaging to minimize the potential for static
discharge when
handling these materials. 3). Provide physical chokes/rotary valves/fast
acting dampers
and valves to block any flame front that might be produced in the
enclosure areas. 4).
Provide explosion protection for all processes involving pouring/charging
of flammable
materials.
NOTE:ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM.
See page 2,"Notification of Corrective Action" for instructions.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100.00
  • · Z (S) $3500.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 302714340.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.