ASPEN, CO ·
OSHA Inspection: SNOWS CAISSON DRILLING INC.
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of SNOWS CAISSON DRILLING INC. in 1600 MAROON CREEK RD., ASPEN, CO 81611 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 302766654.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SNOWS CAISSON DRILLING INC.
- Site address
- 1600 MAROON CREEK RD.
- City
- ASPEN
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 81611
- Mailing
- 8500 E. WARREN AVE., DENVER, CO 80231
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1799
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1999
- Abate by
- Oct 21, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $875
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employmnent and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of heavy metal anchor plates under great pressure coming loose and striking the employees: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct would be to instruct the employees in the proper procedures for using the bolt anchors, and conducting an inspection of the entire drilling operation before starting each job. a) At 1600 Maroon Creek Rd. Aspen, CO. (G.E. Johnson Construction Co. jobsite): Employees doing drilling operations in an elevator shaft were exposed to flying object hazards. The anchors for the winch pulley were improperly installed allowing the anchor plate and cable to come loose. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter"). Evaluation of 5a1 elements 1. The employer failed to keep the workplace free of a hazard to which employees of that employer were exposed: The improperly installed metal plate came loose and allowed the wire rope and the plate to strike the job foreman who was running the controls of the winch. He missed several days of work and work was stopped at this site. 2. The hazard was recognized: The crew members knew there was extreme force on this pulley which transferred the pull in a 90 degree angle. The anchor plate was made with more holes in it because of this force. The EEs who installed the plate noted the honeycomb effect of the concrete and told the foreman. The anchor industry sends out warnings as to how deep and how much surrounding concrete there should be to safely secure the anchors. Experience shows that anchors placed at the edge of concrete pours crack and pull out. 3. The hazard was causing or was likely to cause death or serious physicl harm: Serious enough harm was done to the victim to have him miss days of work. The idea of a very heavy metal object and several feet of wire rope being under enough pressure to hold a 5000 pound drilling rig means that common sense sees a problem if this plate comes unanchored. 4. There was a feasible and useful method to correct the hazard. Training the employees involved in the set-up of the drilling operation as to industry standards for installation of anchor bolts. Training the employees as to the idea of sheer strengty vs pull-out strength and how the placement of the plate affects this. Requiring the foreman to do a site inspection of all anchors before the operation begins would also allow for the hazard to be spotted and abated before it becomes a hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $875.00
- · Z (S) $875.00
1926.403 I02 I
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1999
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500.00
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1926.405 E01
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1999
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 1999
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1999
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 1999
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1926.416 E01
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1999
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 1999
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1926.552 A03 I
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1999
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $525 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $525.00
- · Z (S) $875.00
1926.552 A03 II
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1999
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 1999
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
More inspections at Snows Caisson Drilling INC.
View Snows Caisson Drilling INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 302766654.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.