AURORA, CO —
OSHA Inspection: U.S. POSTAL SERVICE - MAIL PROCESSING ANNEX (PMA)
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of U.S. POSTAL SERVICE - MAIL PROCESSING ANNEX (PMA) in 20101 E. 36TH DRIVE, AURORA, CO 80011 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 302772454.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- U.S. POSTAL SERVICE - MAIL PROCESSING ANNEX (PMA)
- Site address
- 20101 E. 36TH DRIVE
- City
- AURORA
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80011
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4311
- Employees
- 300
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2000
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $1,350 · Current $540 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: (a)The hazard of moving parts, rotating parts, pinch, nip, squeeze injury due to lack of audible/visual restarts devices installed on the conveyor system to alert personnel working around the conveyor line of start-ups and restarts. One feasible method to correct this hazard would be to provide restarts warning devices and so arranged to warn personnel working around the conveyor line of start-ups and restarts and to train personnel of the function of such devices. (b)The hazard of moving parts, rotating parts, pinch, nip, squeeze injury due to lack of emergency stop devices to permit free access for personnel in case of and emergency stop. One feasible method to correct this hazard would be to provide emergency stop devices and so arranged to permit personnel ready access in case of a emergency stop and to train personnel in the safe operation of such devices. 5(a)(l): Elements (1) The employer failed to keep the workplace free of hazards to which employees of the employer were exposed to moving, rotating parts, pinch, nip personal injury due to lack of conveyor audible/visual restart devices. (2) The hazard is a recognized hazard in that an American National Standard (ASME B20.1-1996-Safety Standard For Conveyors And Related Equipment)- 5.11.2 Control Station. It states: "When a conveyor that would cause injury when is automatically controlled or must be controlled from a remote location, an audible device or devices shall be provided that can be clearly heard at all hazardous points along the conveyor where personnel may be present". (3) The hazard is causing or likely to cause serious physical harm due to an unexpected contact with moving, rotating parts, pinch, nip conveyor elements. (4) One feasible method to correct this hazard would be to provide restarts warning devices and so arranged and maintained to warn personnel working around the conveyor line of start-ups and restarts. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter").
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $540.00
- — Z (S) $1350.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2000
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $1,350 · Current $100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: (a)The hazard of being struck by uncontrolled free falling bulk mail while lifting the commodity trailer door to unload mail onto the hopper. Among others, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to provide a commodity trailer door that will prevent personnel from entering the hazardous unloading/dumping hopper area. 5(a)(l) Elements (1) The employer failed to keep the workplace free of hazards to which employees of the employer were exposed to the hazard of an unexpected uncontrolled free falling of bulk material that would create an impact personal injury. (2) The hazard is a recognized hazard in that an American National Standard (ASME B20.1-1996-Safety Standard For Conveyors And Related Equipment).5.13 (a) and (b) It states: "At transfer, loading, and discharge points where unconfined and uncontrolled free fall or material can result from flooding, ricocheting, overloading trajectory, leakage, or a combination thereof, such unconfined and uncontrolled free fall of material shall be prevented if it would create a hazard to personnel". (b) In the absence of a guard or barrier specifically erected to protect personnel, warnings shall be provided to restrict unauthorized personnel from entering hazardous loading, unloading, and transfer areas". (3) The hazard is causing or likely to cause serious physical harm due to an unexpected uncontrolled free falling of bulk material resulting in an impact personal injury. (4) One feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to provide a commodity trailer door which will prevent personnel from entering the hazardous unloading/dumping hopper area. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter").
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $100.00
- — Z (S) $1350.00
More inspections at U.S. Postal Service - Mail Processing Annex (PMA)
View U.S. Postal Service - Mail Processing Annex (PMA)'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 302772454.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.