Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: REGENCY CLEANERS AND LAUNDRAMAT

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of REGENCY CLEANERS AND LAUNDRAMAT in 3912 UNIVERSITY DR., DURHAM, NC 27707 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 302866876.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Regency Cleaners and Laundramat for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Regency Cleaners and Laundramat is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3912 UNIVERSITY DR.
City
DURHAM
State
NC
ZIP
27707
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
7211
Employees
26
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

5 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 1999
Abate by
Jun 21, 1999
Penalty
Initial $500 · Current $250 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North
Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to each of his employees
conditions of employment and
a place of employment free from recognized hazards that were causing or
likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were exposed to
damage to the eyes:
a)dry clean area-emergency eyewash fountain needed to flush eyes in the
event of
contact with dry cleaning chemicals, was used for the storage of pins,
buttons,
and other items found in suit pockets, and also the nozzles covers were
not kept
in place, as required by Para 5.1.2 and 5.1.3, ANSI Z358.1-1990.
One feasible means of abatement is to reinstall the bin formally used to
place
these items in and train the employees to use it instead of the basin of
the
eyewash fountain.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $250.00
  • · Z (S) $500.00

1910.264 C04 IIIA

Serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 1999
Abate by
Jul 4, 1999
Penalty
Initial $500 · Current $250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $250.00
  • · Z (S) $500.00

1910.303 B01

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 1999
Abate by
Jul 4, 1999
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $350.00
  • · Z (S) $700.00

1910.303 G02 II

Serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 1999
Abate by
Jul 4, 1999
Penalty
Initial $700
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S) $700.00

1910.334 A02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 1999
Abate by
Jun 21, 1999

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 302866876.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.