Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GEORGE B.H. MACOMBER COMPANY, INCORPORATED

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GEORGE B.H. MACOMBER COMPANY, INCORPORATED in 95 EAST INDIA ROW, BOSTON, MA 02110 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 302921515.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch George B.H. Macomber Company, Incorporated — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for George B.H. Macomber Company, Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
95 EAST INDIA ROW
City
BOSTON
State
MA
ZIP
02110
Mailing
ONE DESIGN CENTER PLACE SUITE 600, BOSTON, MA 02210
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Y
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
1542
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2000
Abate by
Jun 20, 2000
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety & Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized
hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in
that, employees were
exposed to being struck by or caught in between the swinging
superstructure of Caterpillar 350L
crawler excavator:
Job Site Southwest side of site.
1) Employees were walking in close proximity to the working excavator to
travel to and
from the site General Contractor and sub-contractor trailers.
2) The excavator was working within close proximity to the bank of job
site portable
toilets.
3) The excavator was working in close proximity to a site access gate.
One feasible method of abating this hazard is to construct a barrier
around
the excavator
work area to prevent employees from entering the danger zone. In
conjunction with this
method, appropriate training must be administered to all individuals on
the site informing
them of this danger zone of the working excavator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000.00
  • — Z (S) $2000.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 302921515.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.