MIDLAND, NC —
OSHA Inspection: J.O. FLOWE GRADING CO., INC.
Accident-driven inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven health inspection of J.O. FLOWE GRADING CO., INC. in HWY 601 PO BOX 215, MIDLAND, NC 28107 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 303139166.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J.O. FLOWE GRADING CO., INC.
- Site address
- HWY 601 PO BOX 215
- City
- MIDLAND
- State
- NC
- ZIP
- 28107
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1794
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Construction health.
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
95012901
- Issued
- Dec 22, 1999
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a)jobsite - manhole #12, on October 5, 1999 a pipe crew worker entered a newly constructed manhole approximately 21 feet in depth which had been built over an active 8 inch sewer line. Atmospheric testing or monitoring was not conducted to ensure the new manhole did not contain a toxic or flammable contaminant or an oxygen deficient atmosphere prior to entry. The employee entered to point-up the bottom (seal the joints and install the invert). The employee lost consciousness and became unresponsive. Additionally, protective equipment and rescue equipment was not provided for employee use. b)jobsite, on October 5, 1999 a pipe crew worker entered manhole #12 in an attempt to rescue a co-worker who was unconscious and unresponsive at the bottom of the 21-foot manhole. Atmospheric testing or monitoring was not conducted to ensure that the new manhole did not contain a toxic or flammable contaminant or an oxygen deficient atmosphere prior to entry. The employee was overcome and lost consciousness. Additionally, protective equipment and rescue equipment was not provided for employee use. c)jobsite - manhole #12, on October 5, 1999 a pan operator entered manhole #12 in an attempt to rescue two co- workers who were unconscious and unresponsive at the bottom of the 21-foot manhole. Atmospheric testing or monitoring was not conducted to ensure the new manhole did not contain a toxic or flammable contaminant or an oxygen deficient atmosphere prior to entry. The employee became dizzy, disoriented, and experienced shortness of breath. The employee was able to exit the space. Additionally, protective equipment and rescue equipment was not provided for employee use. d)jobsite, on October 5, 1999 a track-hoe operator entered manhole #12 in an attempted to rescue two co-workers who were unconscious and unresponsive at the bottom of the 21-foot manhole. Atmospheric testing or monitoring was not conducted to ensure that the new manhole did not contain a toxic or flammable contaminant or an oxygen deficient atmosphere prior to entry. The employee became dizzy, disoriented, and experienced shortness of breath. He was able to exit the space. The employee re-entered the manhole for a second rescue attempt however, he was forced to exit the space again due to "bad fumes". Additionally, protective equipment and rescue equipment was not provided for employee use. Feasible and acceptable methods to correct this hazard includes, but are not limited to: 1Perform atmospheric testing or monitoring of all confined spaces such as, but not limited to, new and existing manholes prior to entry and periodically monitor while employees are in confined spaces. Provide ventilating equipment to obtain acceptable entry conditions prior to entry. Provide rescue and emergency equipment at the site. 2.Develop and implement a permit-required confined space program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.146 North Carolina Occupational Safety and Health Standard for General Industry. 3.Develop and implement a confined space program in accordance with American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Z117.1- 1995.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2800.00
- — I (S) $2800.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1926.21 B06 I
- Issued
- Dec 22, 1999
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $5,000
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5000.00
- — I (S) $3500.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1926.103 A02
- Issued
- Dec 22, 1999
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2800.00
- — I (S) $2800.00
- — Z (S) $2800.00
More inspections at J.O. Flowe Grading CO., INC.
View J.O. Flowe Grading CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in NC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 303139166.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.