Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J.O. FLOWE GRADING CO., INC.

Accident-driven inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven health inspection of J.O. FLOWE GRADING CO., INC. in HWY 601 PO BOX 215, MIDLAND, NC 28107 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 303139166.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J.O. Flowe Grading CO., INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J.O. Flowe Grading CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
HWY 601 PO BOX 215
City
MIDLAND
State
NC
ZIP
28107
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
1794
Employees
12
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Construction health.

3 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Deleted Serious 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 1999
Abate by
Dec 28, 1999
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,800 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to
each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of
employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)jobsite - manhole #12, on October 5, 1999 a pipe crew
worker entered a newly constructed manhole approximately
21 feet in depth which had been built over an active 8
inch sewer line.  Atmospheric testing or monitoring was
not conducted to ensure the new manhole did not contain
a toxic or flammable contaminant or an oxygen deficient
atmosphere prior to entry.  The employee entered to
point-up the bottom (seal the joints and install the
invert).  The employee lost consciousness and became
unresponsive.   Additionally, protective equipment and
rescue equipment was not provided for employee use.
b)jobsite, on October 5, 1999 a pipe crew worker entered
manhole #12 in an attempt to rescue a co-worker who was
unconscious and unresponsive at the bottom of the 21-foot
manhole.  Atmospheric testing or monitoring was not
conducted to ensure that the new manhole did not contain
a toxic or flammable contaminant or an oxygen deficient
atmosphere prior to entry.  The employee was overcome and
lost consciousness.  Additionally, protective equipment
and rescue equipment was not provided for employee use.
c)jobsite - manhole #12, on October 5, 1999 a pan operator
entered manhole #12 in an attempt to rescue two co-
workers who were unconscious and unresponsive at the
bottom of the 21-foot manhole.  Atmospheric testing or
monitoring was not conducted to ensure the new manhole
did not contain a toxic or flammable contaminant or an
oxygen deficient atmosphere prior to entry.  The employee
became dizzy, disoriented, and experienced shortness of
breath.  The employee was able to exit the space.
Additionally, protective equipment and rescue equipment
was not provided for employee use.
d)jobsite, on October 5, 1999 a track-hoe operator entered
manhole #12 in an attempted to rescue two co-workers who
were unconscious and unresponsive at the bottom of the
21-foot manhole.  Atmospheric testing or monitoring was
not conducted to ensure that the new manhole did not
contain a toxic or flammable contaminant or an oxygen
deficient atmosphere prior to entry.  The employee became
dizzy, disoriented, and experienced shortness of breath.
He was able to exit the space.  The employee re-entered
the manhole for a second rescue attempt however, he was
forced to exit the space again due to "bad fumes".
Additionally, protective equipment and rescue equipment
was not provided for employee use.
Feasible and acceptable methods to correct this hazard includes,
but are not limited to:
1Perform atmospheric testing or monitoring of all confined
spaces such as, but not limited to, new and existing manholes
prior to entry and periodically monitor while employees are in
confined spaces.  Provide ventilating equipment to obtain
acceptable entry conditions prior to entry.  Provide rescue
and emergency equipment at the site.
2.Develop and implement a permit-required confined space program
in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.146 North Carolina Occupational
Safety and Health Standard for General Industry.
3.Develop and implement a confined space program in accordance
with American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Z117.1-
1995.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2800.00
  • — I (S) $2800.00
  • — Z (S) $3500.00

1926.21 B06 I

Serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 1999
Abate by
Dec 28, 1999
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $5,000
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5000.00
  • — I (S) $3500.00
  • — Z (S) $3500.00

1926.103 A02

Deleted Serious 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 1999
Abate by
Dec 28, 1999
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2800.00
  • — I (S) $2800.00
  • — Z (S) $2800.00

View J.O. Flowe Grading CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 303139166.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.