OSHA Inspection: CAROLINA MILLS, INCORPORATED

Issued

Dec 30, 1999

Abate by

Jan 18, 2000

Penalty

Initial $875 · Current $875

General-duty citation text

North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to
each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of
employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)facility; weaving - monorail systems have not been load
tested.
REFERENCE:  ANSI/ASME B30.11 - 1998 11-2.2.2 paragraph (a)
New, reinstalled, altered, repaired, and modified equipment
should be load tested prior to initial use...
NOTE:  One acceptable and feasible means of abatement is to
have the monorail systems load tested.

Issued

Dec 30, 1999

Abate by

Jan 18, 2000

Penalty

Initial $875

General-duty citation text

North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to
each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of
employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)facility; weaving - monorail systems have not had annual
inspection.
REFERENCE:  ANSI/ASME B30.11 - 1998 11-2.2.1 Inspection
classification paragraph (a)..Prior to initial use, all new,
reinstalled, altered, or monorail system shall be
inspected...(b) on a periodic basis.
Note: One acceptable and feasible methods of abatement is to
have the monorail systems inspected annualy.d

Issued

Dec 30, 1999

Abate by

Jan 18, 2000

Penalty

Initial $875

General-duty citation text

North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to
each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of
employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)facility; weaving - the spreader bar below the hook
lifting device has not been inspected on a frequent or
periodic basis.
REFERENCE:  ANSI/ASME B30.20 - 1985 20-1.3.1 Inspection
classification paragraph (a)  Prior to initial use, all new,
altered, modified, or repaired lifting devices shall be
inspected...
NOTE:  One acceptable and feasible means of abatement is to
have the below the hook lifting devices inspected on a
frequent and periodic basis.ic

Issued

Dec 30, 1999

Abate by

Jan 18, 2000

Issued

Dec 30, 1999

Abate by

Jan 18, 2000

Penalty

Initial $875

General-duty citation text

North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to
each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of
employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)facility; weaving - the spreader bar below the hook
lifting device has not been load tested.
REFERENCE:  ANSI/ASME B30.11 - 1998 11-2.2.2 Load test
paragraph (a)  New, reinstalled, altered, repaired, and
modified equipment should be load tested....
NOTE:  One acceptable and feasible means of abatement is to
have the below the hook lifting devices load tested.

Issued

Dec 30, 1999

Abate by

Jan 5, 2000

Penalty

Initial $375 · Current $375

Issued

Dec 30, 1999

Abate by

Jan 18, 2000

Issued

Dec 30, 1999

Abate by

Jan 18, 2000