FLANDERS, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: LAMTEC CORPORATION
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of LAMTEC CORPORATION in BARTLEY-CHESTER RD., FLANDERS, NJ 07836 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 303263834.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LAMTEC CORPORATION
- Site address
- BARTLEY-CHESTER RD.
- City
- FLANDERS
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07836
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2679
- Employees
- 82
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2000
- Abate by
- Feb 17, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $1,225 · Current $934 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a crushing hazard: a) Production Floor near Bed Roll Machine:The employer failed to implement a procedure to ensure that rolls of material are not able to roll off the pallet during transfer. Violation observed on or about 2/3/00. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to follow the current policy of blocking the material after transfer from the Roll Bed to the pallet.r
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $934.00
- · Z (S) $1225.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2000
- Abate by
- Feb 17, 2000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to being crushed by the forklift in the event of a rollover: a) Production floor:Employees who operate forklift trucks were not required to wear seatbelts that were equipped on Hyster 50 Power Industrial Truck. Observed on or about 2/3/00. Among others, one feasible abatement method is to instruct and require employees to wear seat belts.ees
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2000
- Abate by
- Feb 17, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $627 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $627.00
- · Z (S) $875.00
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2000
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $408 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $408.00
- · Z (S) $525.00
More inspections at Lamtec Corporation
View Lamtec Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 303263834.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.