SAN ANGELO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: AQUILA MACHINE & SERVICE, INC.
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of AQUILA MACHINE & SERVICE, INC. in MAYERS RANCH #2, SAN ANGELO, TX 76902 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 303413512.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AQUILA MACHINE & SERVICE, INC.
- Site address
- MAYERS RANCH #2
- City
- SAN ANGELO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76902
- Mailing
- PO BOX 966, BIG LAKE, TX 76932
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1389
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2000
- Abate by
- Jul 3, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: (a) Mayers Lease, Well No. 2, near San Angelo, Texas: On or about 09 June 2000, the main disconnect providing power to the electrical control panel of the oil well pumping unit was not locked-out. The employee was exposed to a struck-by-moving parts (i.e. counterweights) hazard and a fall-from-elevation hazard while he was standing on top of the gearbox servicing the brakes while the unit was pumping. One feasible and accepted method would be to use a lock-out program to protect employees from energy sources and to require the use of personnel fall protection when exposed to a fall-from-elevation hazard.om-elevation
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2000
- Abate by
- Jul 3, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $300.00
- — Z (O) $300.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 303413512.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.