LUTHER, OK ·
OSHA Inspection: GENESIS DRILLING
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GENESIS DRILLING in 8.5 MI NORTH, 1.25 MI EAST, LUTHER, OK 73054 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 303643670.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GENESIS DRILLING
- Site address
- 8.5 MI NORTH, 1.25 MI EAST
- City
- LUTHER
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 73054
- Mailing
- 7351 HOLIDAY ROAD, GUTHRIE, OK 73044
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1381
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
15 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2001
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the recognized hazard of being struck by high-pressure drilling- fluid hoses: a. Above the drilling platform; the pump end of the rotary hose was subject to come loose and fall upon employees on the drilling platform. One feasible and acceptable method to abate this hazard is to secure this end of the rotary hose to the derrick with a chain or wire rope. In the mud pump area; the high-pressure mud-pump hoses were not secured to prevent them from whipping in the event they came loose. One feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to secure the ends of these hoses with a wire rope or chain. ***Certification and Documentation of Abatement Required***on
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2001
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the recognized hazard of becoming entangled in the catline around the cathead: On the drilling platform at the draw works; employees used the catline and cathead to lift objects onto the drilling platform; they were subject to be crushed or otherwise injured. One feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to ensure that a qualified person is at the controls to immediately stop the cathead if necessary. ***Certification and Documentation of Abatement Required***on
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2001
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the recognized hazard of being crushed by rolling joints of casing: In the pipe rack area; employee(s) worked inside the pipe racks as joints of casing were being rolled onto the catwalk for placement in the well; the pipe racks were not level; employee(s) were subject to be crushed by casing rolling from a higher position to a lower one. One feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to ensure that the pipe racks are level and to move the casing from the ends of the joint while standing outside the pipe racks. ***Certification and Documentation of Abatement Required***on
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2001
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $450
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the recognized hazard of being struck or crushed by falling loads: On the catwalk; employee(s) worked immediately beside joints of casing that were being lifted onto the drilling platform with the catline; the casing was subject to fall, bounce and/or roll onto the employee. One feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to require employee(s) to move away from suspended loads. ***Certification and Documentation of Abatement Required***on
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2001
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employee(s) working in the derrick were exposed to the recognized hazard of being unable to safely escape in the event of a fire or other emergency: An employee worked in the derrick as drill pipe and collars were removed from the well in preparation to run surface casing into the well; a fire or other emergency could have resulted from a blowout, a leak and ignition of diesel fuel or other event. One feasible and acceptable method to abate this hazard is to install an auxiliary means of escape prior to personnel working in the derrick. ***Certification and Documentation of Abatement Required***on
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2001
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
1910.24 E
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2001
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $450
1910.27 D02 II
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2001
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2001
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2001
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2001
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2002
1910.303 G02 II
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2001
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
1910.141 C01 I
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2001
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2001
1910.151 B
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2001
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2001
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2001
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2002
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in OK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 303643670.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.