Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: GENESIS DRILLING

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GENESIS DRILLING in 8.5 MI NORTH, 1.25 MI EAST, LUTHER, OK 73054 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 303643670.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Genesis Drilling for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Genesis Drilling is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GENESIS DRILLING
Site address
8.5 MI NORTH, 1.25 MI EAST
City
LUTHER
State
OK
ZIP
73054
Mailing
7351 HOLIDAY ROAD, GUTHRIE, OK 73044
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
1381
Employees
12
Ownership type
Private (A)

15 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2001
Abate by
Dec 26, 2001
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $750
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that
employees were exposed to the recognized hazard of being struck by
high-pressure drilling-
fluid hoses:
a. Above the drilling platform; the pump end of the rotary hose was
subject to come
loose and fall upon employees on the drilling platform.  One feasible and
acceptable
method to abate this hazard is to secure this end of the rotary hose to
the derrick with
a chain or wire rope.
In the mud pump area; the high-pressure mud-pump hoses were not secured to
prevent them from whipping in the event they came loose.  One feasible and
acceptable method to correct this hazard is to secure the ends of these
hoses with a
wire rope or chain.
***Certification and Documentation of Abatement Required***on

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2001
Abate by
Dec 26, 2001
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $750
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that
employees were exposed to the recognized hazard of becoming entangled in
the catline
around the cathead:
On the drilling platform at the draw works; employees used the catline and
cathead to lift
objects onto the drilling platform; they were subject to be crushed or
otherwise injured.  One
feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to ensure that a
qualified person is at
the controls to immediately stop the cathead if necessary.
***Certification and Documentation of Abatement Required***on

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2001
Abate by
Dec 26, 2001
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $750
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that
employees were exposed to the recognized hazard of being crushed by
rolling joints of
casing:
In the pipe rack area; employee(s) worked inside the pipe racks as joints
of casing were
being rolled onto the catwalk for placement in the well; the pipe racks
were not level;
employee(s) were subject to be crushed by casing rolling from a higher
position to a lower
one.  One feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to
ensure that the pipe
racks are level and to move the casing from the ends of the joint while
standing outside the
pipe racks.
***Certification and Documentation of Abatement Required***on

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2001
Abate by
Dec 26, 2001
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $450
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees
in that
employees were exposed to the recognized hazard of being struck or crushed
by falling
loads:
On the catwalk; employee(s) worked immediately beside joints of casing
that were being
lifted onto the drilling platform with the catline; the casing was subject
to fall, bounce and/or
roll onto the employee.  One feasible and acceptable method to correct
this hazard is to
require employee(s) to move away from suspended loads.
***Certification and Documentation of Abatement Required***on

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2001
Abate by
Dec 26, 2001
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $750
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that
employee(s) working in the derrick were exposed to the recognized hazard
of being unable to
safely escape in the event of a fire or other emergency:
An employee worked in the derrick as drill pipe and collars were removed
from the well in
preparation to run surface casing into the well; a fire or other emergency
could have resulted
from a blowout, a leak and ignition of diesel fuel or other event.  One
feasible and
acceptable method to abate this hazard is to install an auxiliary means of
escape prior to
personnel working in the derrick.
***Certification and Documentation of Abatement Required***on

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2001
Abate by
Jan 10, 2002
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500

1910.24 E

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2001
Abate by
Jan 10, 2002
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $450

1910.27 D02 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2001
Abate by
Dec 26, 2001
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2001
Abate by
Jan 10, 2002
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2001
Abate by
Jan 10, 2002
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $750

1910.219 E03 I

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2001
Abate by
Jan 10, 2002

1910.303 G02 II

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2001
Abate by
Dec 26, 2001
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $750

1910.141 C01 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2001
Abate by
Dec 31, 2001

1910.151 B

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2001
Abate by
Dec 31, 2001

1910.1200 F05

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2001
Abate by
Jan 10, 2002

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 303643670.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.