GREGORY, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: CORPUS CHRISTI DRILLING & WORKOVER, L.L.C. RIG 14
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of CORPUS CHRISTI DRILLING & WORKOVER, L.L.C. RIG 14 in 1.7 MI WEST OF TEXAS HWY 136, GREGORY, TX 78359 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 303684385.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CORPUS CHRISTI DRILLING & WORKOVER, L.L.C. RIG 14
- Site address
- 1.7 MI WEST OF TEXAS HWY 136
- City
- GREGORY
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78359
- Mailing
- 311 SARATOGA BOULEVARD, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78417
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1381
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
20 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,675 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fire, explosion and/or rig collapse hazards due to improper rigging of the Geronimo Emergency Escape Line and installation of the Geronimo Emergency Escape Device on the Geronimo Emergency Escape Line: a.Geronimo Emergency Escape Device was rigged approximately ten (10) feet above the walking surface of the pipe racking board approximately seventy-three (73) feet above ground level with no means of safe access to the Geronimo Emergency Escape Device. b.The Geronimo Emergency Escape Line was installed in such a manner that the upper end of the Line was wrapped around the Southeast leg of the upper section of the derrick, approximately ten (10) feet above the walking surface of the pipe racking board, attached with a shackle put through an open loop at the upper end of the Line, with the other end of the Line going through the shackle, and the pin threaded into the threads of the "U" bolt. c.The Geronimo Emergency Escape Line was anchored in a steep manner and did not allow enough travel distance on the opposite side of an earthen levee for the fresh water pond, to allow employees to stop twenty (20) to twenty-five (25) feet prior to the anchoring point. d.The Geronimo Emergency Escape Line was anchored to the top of a forty- four and one-half (44 1/2) inch long, one and one-half (1 1/2) inch by one and one-half (1 1/2) inch square steel stake/anchor driven into the plowed grain field approximately twenty-seven and one-half (27 1/2) inches. The shackle passed through a drilled hole in the top of the square steel stake, and the end of the Geronimo Emergency Escape Line passed through the "U" Bolt of the shackle and then was secured to the live end of the wire rope line by Crosby clips.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3675.00
- · Z (S) $4900.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck-by elevated equipment due to failure of deteriorated pipe threads, inadequate welds on metal safety clamp lugs or rupture of equipment: a.At the gooseneck of the standpipe 1.Four (4) inch nipple 2.Four (4) inch hammer connection union 3.Metal clamp with lug 4.Top of rotary hose b.At the gooseneck of the swivel 1.Four (4) inch nipple 2.Four (4) inch hammer connection union 3.Metal clamp with lug 4.Bottom of rotary hose c.Fragmented parts of the Gardner Denver PZ 9 mud pumps in the event of rupture. Among other methods, one (1) feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement a maintenance and inspection program as addressed in the International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC) Drilling Manual.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S) $4900.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,675 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a fire and explosion hazard: a.Employer had not trained designated rig personnel in an adequate understanding of the blowout preventer system. b.Employer did not conduct BOP drills under a variety of conditions. c.Employer did not inspect the blowout prevention equipment daily and perform a blowout preventer activation test prior to each round trip. One (1) feasible and acceptable method of abatement to assure well control at all times is to have: 1.Assure that designated personnel have an understanding of and are able to operate the blowout preventer equipment. 2.Conduct testing of blowout preventer equipment to assure the equipment is functioning properly during drilling and well completion operations as addressed in the American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice for Occupational Safety for Oil and Gass Well Drilling and Servicing Operations.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3675.00
- · Z (S) $4900.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,675 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of collapse of the derrick mast: Employees were exposed to the hazard of collapse of the derrick (mast) resulting from the improper erection and guying of the Wilson Model 75 Winchmobile Single Drum, Back-in drilling unit, Serial Number 10643 with a Wilson 110 foot, 354,000 pounds on Ten (10) lines derrick (mast). This occurred at Rig Number 14 on May 17, 2001, while employees were required to perform work off the rig floor and pipe racking board. Among other methods, one (1) feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to ensure proper erection and guying procedures. Essential elements of this procedure would include: 1.Following the Rig Manufacturer's Instruction Manual for requirements on correct and proper steps to derrick (mast) erection. 2.Following the Rig Manufacturer's Instruction Manual for requirements on correct and proper guying and guyline installation. 3.Installing hand placed auger anchors for the wire rope guylines.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3675.00
- · Z (S) $4900.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of collapse of the derrick (mast): The employer had not properly trained nor adequately instructed the employees in the correct and proper manner to erect the Wilson Model 75, Winchmobile Single Drum, Back-in drilling unit, Serial Number 10643 with a Wilson 110 foot 354,000 pounds on Ten (10) lines derrick which exposed employees to the hazard of collapse of the derrick (mast) resulting from the improper erection and guying. Among other methods, one (1) feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to ensure properly trained and adequately instructed employees in the proper and correct method of erection and guying procedures by following the Rig Manufacturer's Instruction Manual erection, guying and anchoring requirements.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S) $4900.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,675 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard: Employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck-by elevated equipment due to failure to provide lengths of chain/wire rope slings as a secondary securing method for the elevated upper end of the four (4) inch rotary hose at the standpipe gooseneck and at each end of the four (4) inch vibrator hoses between the steel pipe of the standpipe and the discharge outlet of each Gardner Denver PZ 9 mud pump. Among other methods, one (1) feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to install lengths of chain/wire rope slings as a secondary securing method for the elevated upper end of the four (4) inch rotary hose at the standpipe gooseneck and at each end of the four (4) inch vibrator hoses between the steel pipe of the standpipe and the discharge outlet of each Gardner Denver PZ 9 mud pump.r
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3675.00
- · Z (S) $4900.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,675 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard: Employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard due to the improper number and installation of Crosby clips on the lifting wire rope lines/snub lines for the break- out tongs and the make-up tongs. The employer had also failed to install thimbles at the ends of some of the wire rope guylines where an eye was formed to prevent crushing of the wire rope. Among other methods, one (1) feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to install the correct number with proper installation of the Crosby clips on the lifting wire rope lines/snub lines for the break-out tongs and the make-up tongs. The employer also should implement a work rule requiring the installation of thimbles in all of the guylines where they connect to the derrick or to the closed eyes of turnbuckles.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3675.00
- · Z (S) $4900.00
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2625.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.151 B
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $1,750 · Current $1,313 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1313.00
- · Z (S) $1750.00
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2625.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2625.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2625.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2625.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.305 B02
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2625.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.305 D
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.305 G01 I
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.305 G02 II
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2625.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2625.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.307 B
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2625.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2001
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2001
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 303684385.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.