Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: READES SERVICES, INC.

Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of READES SERVICES, INC. in 52 SECOND AVENUE, WALTHAM, MA 02451 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 303806665.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Reades Services, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Reades Services, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
52 SECOND AVENUE
City
WALTHAM
State
MA
ZIP
02451
Mailing
277 WHITWELL STREET, QUINCY, MA 02169
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
7349
Employees
15
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2001
Abate by
Dec 14, 2001
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to the hazard of falling while utilizing a descent control
device to wash windows:
(a) Location - 52 Second Avenue, Waltham, MA:
On or about 07/20/2001, an employee was working from a "Sky Genie"
seatboard
utilizing a descent control device called a "Rack". The unit was hung from
a
single 5/8 inch nylon braided rope that was placed directly over the edge
of a 24"
parapet wall. The rope was looped around a four inch diameter galvanized
pipe
approximately sixteen inches high with no projections.
(b) Location - 52 Second Avenue, Waltham, MA:
On or about 07/16/2001 and 07/20/2001, an employee was working from a "Sky
Genie" seatboard utilizing a descent control device called a "Rack". The
unit
was
hung from a single 5/8 inch nylon braided rope that was tied back to a
"Bosuns
Mate" outrigger beam. The life line the employee was utilizing was tied
back to
the outrigger.
Among other means, Feasible means of abatement would be to :
1) Train employees in the use of Sky Genie Seatboard and descent devices
including, but
not limited to, the "Rack" and the "Bosuns Mate".
2) Inspect rope, descent equipment, and Sky Genie Seatboard each day
before use; and
3) Ensure proper rigging, including sound anchorages and tie backs, in all
cases with
particular emphasis on providing tiebacks when outrigger beams along with
counterweights or cornice hooks, or similar non permanent anchorage
systems are used;
and
4) Ensure that all lines installed, (with knots, swages, eye splices, or
similar methods
with rigging descent control devices), are capable of sustaining the
tensile loads imposed.
A tensile load strength of 5000 pounds is considered adequate; and
5) Ensure all ropes are effectively padded where they contact edges of the
building,
anchorage, obstructions, or other surfaces which might cut or weaken the
rope;and
6) Ensure a separate personal fall arrest system is used, such as a full
body harness, rope
grab or a similar device with lifeline anchorage points independent of the
friction device,
support seat (or harness), support line or anchorage system so that any
failure of the
system will not effect the ability of the fall arrest system to operate
and quickly stop the
employees fall.yees
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4200.00
  • · Z (S) $4200.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 303806665.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.