Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WALTON TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of WALTON TECHNOLOGY, INC. in CHESAPEAKE/DELAWARE CANAL BRIDGE, CHESAPEAKE CITY, MD 21915 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 303854939.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Walton Technology, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Walton Technology, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
CHESAPEAKE/DELAWARE CANAL BRIDGE
City
CHESAPEAKE CITY
State
MD
ZIP
21915
Mailing
1106 COMMERCE DRIVE, RICHARDSON, TX 75081
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
8711
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2001
Abate by
May 22, 2001
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupaional safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer
did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees
in that employees
were exposed to a crush hazard from a lead abatement containment system
failure.
a)Chesapeake/Delaware Canal Bridge - An employee was giving instruction and
assistance to other contractor employees who were in the process of making
adjustments to a steel framed containment system when a failure occurred
causing the structural elements of the containment system to collapse. The
employer failed to detect and correct deficiencies in the welds and the
size of
the U-bolts, which were used to connect each independent containment
support
beam.
One feasible and acceptable abatement method, among others, to correct
this hazard is for
the employer to make an effort to ensure the conformance of the fabricated
containment
system with the contract drawings.

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 303854939.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.