Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: T-VAN BUILDERS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of T-VAN BUILDERS in RESTAURANT-2925 VOYAGER DRIVE, GREEN BAY, WI 54311 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 304011356.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch T-Van Builders for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for T-Van Builders is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
T-VAN BUILDERS
Site address
RESTAURANT-2925 VOYAGER DRIVE
City
GREEN BAY
State
WI
ZIP
54311
Mailing
2676FREEDOM RD., DE PERE, WI 54115
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
1751
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Construction safety.

1 citation on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2001
Abate by
Nov 13, 2001
Penalty
Initial $375 · Current $263 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to multiple injuries or death from a tipping over hazard
using an oversized
platform on a rough terrain forklift truck:
(a) Employees were exposed to multiple injuries and/or death hazards
created by the use of
elevated work platform which were not designed, constructed, and/or used
in accordance with
the acceptable requirements of the American National Safety Standard for
Rough Terrain forklift
Trucks, ASME/ANSI B56.6a-1994 and other acceptable industry practices. For
example: The
platform used did not meet the following design and use requirements of
sections 8.25 and 5.15
of ASME/ANSI B56.6a-1994 in the following areas: (1) Platform dimensions
exceeded in width
more than 10 inches greater than the overall width of the truck on either
side,
(2) Did not have
a maximum work load and empty weight information prominently marked on the
platform, (3)
The platform was not lowered when moved for positioning, (4) A trained
operator was not
available to operate the controls when the platform was not equipped with
controls.
The above conditions were observed when an employee was installing roof
sheeting and facia
at the roof eve of the building front in a 10 foot, 8 inch wide platform
attached to a Sky Lift
rough terrain fork lift truck with a tire width of 8 feet.
Among other methods, feasible and acceptable means to correct these
hazards are to use safer
alternative methods such as a scaffold or use a platform approved by the
manufacturer meeting
the design, manufacture, training, and use requirements of AMSE/ANSI
B56.6a-1994 for all
attachments on rough terrain forklifts.
No Abatement Certification or Abatement Documentation required.tion
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $262.50
  • · Z (S) $375.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 304011356.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.