GRAND FORKS, ND —
OSHA Inspection: C.L. LINFOOT COMPANY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of C.L. LINFOOT COMPANY in CORNER OF BELMONT STREET & THIRD AVENUE SOUTH, GRAND FORKS, ND 58201 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 304199987.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- C.L. LINFOOT COMPANY
- Site address
- CORNER OF BELMONT STREET & THIRD AVENUE SOUTH
- City
- GRAND FORKS
- State
- ND
- ZIP
- 58201
- Mailing
- 4805 DEMERS AVENUE, GRAND FORKS, ND 58201
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1761
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Construction safety.
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2001
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2001
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2001
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 30, 2001
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: (a) Employees were not wearing a fall protection device and were exposed to potential fall hazards while elevated in a boom-supported work platform. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard would be to follow the American National Standards Institute ANSI/SIA A92.5-1992, section 8.8, Responsibilities of Operators During Operation. (b) An employee was not maintaining a firm footing on the platform floor. The employee was observed to be standing on the platform mid rail and was exposed to potential fall hazard while elevated in a boom-supported work platform. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard would be to follow the American National Standards Institute ANSI/SIA A92.5-1992, section 8.10.1, Personnel Footing.l
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- May 30, 2001
- Abate by
- Jun 14, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $750.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
More inspections at C.L. Linfoot Company
View C.L. Linfoot Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in ND
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 304199987.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.