NEW ORLEANS, LA ·
OSHA Inspection: TANO CORP
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of TANO CORP in MILE MARKER 94.1, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, NEW ORLEANS, LA 70117 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 304473853.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TANO CORP
- Site address
- MILE MARKER 94.1, MISSISSIPPI RIVER
- City
- NEW ORLEANS
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 70117
- Mailing
- 5700 CITRUS BLVD, STE E, NEW ORLEANS, LA 70123
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- Yes
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3812
- Employees
- 40
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 28, 2002
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the following condition(s): a) For the period of time up to and including 26 Oct 01, the employer did not verify that affected employee(s) could demonstrate a thorough understanding in the proper use of fall protection, such as but not limited to when and what PPE is necessary. This condition exposed employee(s) to the hazards and injuries related to falls from elevations of approx 100 ft. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to provide specific fall protection training for situations that feild service technicians may encounter. In addition, conduct on the job evaluations to assure that the technicians understand and implement the fall protection requirements as they relate to the various field locations.
Recent events (2)
- · J (S) $3500.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Jan 28, 2002
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the following condition(s): a) For the period of time up to and including 26 Oct 01, the employer did not verify that affected employee(s) could demonstrate an thorough understanding in the proper use of fall protection, such as but not limited to when and what PPE is necessary. This condition exposed employee(s) to the hazards and injuries related to falls from elevations of approx 100 ft. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to provide specific fall protection training for situations that feild service technicians may encounter. In addition, conduct on the job evaluations to assure that the technicians understand and implement the fall protection requirements as they relate to the various field locations.
Recent events (2)
- · J (S) $3500.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.145 C03
- Issued
- Jan 28, 2002
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $875
Recent events (2)
- · J (S) $875.00
- · Z (S) $875.00
1904.8
- Issued
- Jan 28, 2002
- Abate by
- Jan 30, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
Recent events (2)
- · J (O) $2500.00
- · Z (O) $2500.00
More inspections at Tano Corp
View Tano Corp's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in LA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 304473853.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.