EUCLID, OH —
OSHA Inspection: CHESTERFIELD STEEL SERVICE
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CHESTERFIELD STEEL SERVICE in 1220 E. 222ND STREET, EUCLID, OH 44117 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 304483316.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CHESTERFIELD STEEL SERVICE
- Site address
- 1220 E. 222ND STREET
- City
- EUCLID
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44117
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3499
- Employees
- 75
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Construction safety.
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: On and prior to July 18, 2001, employees were exposed to serious injuries while handling coils of steel. Employee/laborers involved with the rebanding of steel coils were doing so inappropriately at their own discretion, by not following the established written procedure which dictates in detail how banding of coils will be accomplished. During the inspection it was evident that employees have not been adequately trained to reband coils of steel properly. There is a serious propensity for injury to occur, since the current rebanding methods are improvisational. It was established that the employer is not enforcing strict adherence to the written banding procedures in place. Among other methods, the following are feasible and acceptable methods to minimize the probability of injury during the handling of steel coils. 1. Develop safe banding procedures which list the sequence of operations, particularly during the rebanding operations following the filling of "cut to order" tasks. 2. Train all effected employees on the requirements set forth in the procedures and related safety precautions including the importance of properly positioning one's self in relation to the coil, particularly when initially lifting a coil off the floor which subjects the coil's bands to more force than when resting on the floor. 3. Enforce employee use of the procedures. 4. Follow ANSI B11.18-1992 recommendations for proper banding which are as included but not limited to the following. a. Banding material should be a minimum of 1 and 1/4 inch wide by .031 inches thick and heat treated. b. All banding seals should be double crimped. c. Corner protectors should be used on all bands placed through the eye of the coil. They should be sufficient enough to protect against rupture of the band due to the sharp edges of the material or too acute of a bend. d. A minimum of 3 bands (equally spaced) should be placed through the eye of the coil. e. Bands should be placed on the circumference of the coil as appropriate for the size, gage and grade of metal. 5. Develop and implement safe placement procedures for banded coils in order to prevent damage and/or corrosion to the banding clips. 6. Develop and implement safe procedures for banded coils in order to prevent undue stresses on the bands of the bottom coils.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.176 B
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.179 N04 II
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2001
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Chesterfield Steel Service
View Chesterfield Steel Service's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 304483316.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.