Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: THE SLOSMAN CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of THE SLOSMAN CORPORATION in 100 FAIRVIEW ROAD, ASHEVILLE, NC 28803 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 304491475.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch The Slosman Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for The Slosman Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
100 FAIRVIEW ROAD
City
ASHEVILLE
State
NC
ZIP
28803
Mailing
PO BOX 3019, ASHEVILLE, NC 28802
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
2297
Employees
60
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.215 A04

Repeat 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2001
Abate by
Sep 4, 2001
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $275 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $275.00
  • — Z (R) $750.00

1910.305 B02

Repeat 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2001
Abate by
Aug 22, 2001
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $275 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $275.00
  • — Z (R) $750.00

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2001
Abate by
Sep 4, 2001
Penalty
Initial $313 · Current $100 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed
to:
a)in the maintenance shop, 3-Ton, Yale, Spur Geared Block
hand chain operated chain hoist mmoved from another shop
had not been load tested.
Ref. ANSI B30.16-2.1.1(a)
Note:  One method to abate this condition is to have the
system load tested after the move to the new location.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $100.00
  • — Z (S) $313.00

95012901

Serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2001
Abate by
Sep 4, 2001
Penalty
Initial $313 · Current $100 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed
to:
a)woven area, 2 Yale Spreader Bars were not clearly marked
with the rated load.
Ref: ASME B30.20.1.2,  Below-the-Hook Lifting Devices,  Markings
and Construction.
Note:  One method to abate this condition is to have both
spreader bars clearly marked with the rated load.
b)woven area, 2 Yale Spreader Bars were not inspected.
Ref: ASME B30.20.1.3(b)
(b)Inspection procedures for lifter in regular service is
divided into two general classifications based on
intervals at which inspections should be performed.  The
two general classifications are frequent and periodic:
(1)Frequent Inspection.
Heavy Service - weekly to monthly
(2)Periodic Inspection.  A visual inspection conducted
by an appointed person who makes records of
apparent external conditions......An external code
mark on the lifter is an acceptable identification
in lieu of records.
Heavy Service - monthly unless external conditions
indicate that disassembly should be done to permit
detailed inspection - semiannually.
One recommended method of abatement is to appoint a designated
person to start a program of scheduled maintenance, i.e.,
inspections.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $100.00
  • — Z (S) $313.00

1910.212 A03 II

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2001
Abate by
Sep 4, 2001
Penalty
Initial $313 · Current $100 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $100.00
  • — Z (S) $313.00

1910.305 G02 III

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2001
Abate by
Aug 23, 2001
Penalty
Initial $438 · Current $150 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $150.00
  • — Z (S) $438.00

1910.305 B01

Serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2001
Abate by
Aug 23, 2001

1910.23 D01 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2001
Abate by
Sep 4, 2001

1910.242 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2001
Abate by
Sep 4, 2001

View The Slosman Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 304491475.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.