MARION, NC ·
OSHA Inspection: RESISTOFLEX COMPANY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RESISTOFLEX COMPANY in ONE QUALITY WAY, MARION, NC 28752 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 304637630.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch Resistoflex Company for free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Resistoflex Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RESISTOFLEX COMPANY
- Site address
- ONE QUALITY WAY
- City
- MARION
- State
- NC
- ZIP
- 28752
- Mailing
- PO BOX 1449, MARION, NC 28752
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3084
- Employees
- 135
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
32 citations on file for this inspection.
95012901
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $963 · Current $963
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a)salt pot area -- a monorail hoist system was labeled as a 1/2 ton system was supporting both a 1 ton Coffing hoist and a 1/2 ton Coffing hoist on the same rail. REFERENCE: ANSI B30.11-1998, Section 11-1.1, Paragraph 11- 1.1.2. Markings. NOTE:Among other methods of abatement, one feasible and acceptable method to abate this hazard is to remove the 1 ton Coffing hoist from the monorail system.l
95012901
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $963 · Current $963
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a)facility wide -- hoists throughout the facility were not inspected frequently as defined in the ANSI standard referenced below . REFERENCE: ANSI B30.11-1998, Section 11-2.1, Paragraph 11- 2.1.2. Frequent Inspections. NOTE:Among other methods of abatement, one feasible and acceptable method to abate this hazard is to inspect each hoist in the facility as required by the above referenced standard.d
95012901
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $963
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a)facility wide -- hoists throughout the facility were not inspected periodically as defined in the ANSI standard referenced below . REFERENCE: ANSI B30.11-1998, Section 11-2.1, Paragraph 11- 2.1.3. Periodic Inspections. NOTE:Among other methods of abatement, one feasible and acceptable method to abate this hazard is to inspect each hoist in the facility as required by the above referenced standard.d
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S) $963.00
95012901
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $963
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a)facility wide -- all inspection records were not maintained on all hoists throughout the facility. REFERENCE: ANSI B30.11-1998, Section 11-2.1, Paragraph 11- 2.1.5. Inspections Records. NOTE:Among other methods of abatement, one feasible and acceptable method to abate this hazard is to maintain all inspection records of each hoist in the facility as required by the above referenced standard.d
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S) $963.00
95012901
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $963
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a)facility wide -- operational tests were not conducted on all hoists before being placed into operation, throughout the facility. REFERENCE: ANSI B30.11-1998, Section 11-2.2, Paragraph 11- 2.2.1. Inspections Records. NOTE:Among other methods of abatement, one feasible and acceptable method to abate this hazard is to conduct operational tests on all hoists in the facility as required by the above referenced standard.d
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S) $963.00
95012901
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $963 · Current $963
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a)facility wide -- before being placed into operation, load tests on all overhead hoists were not conducted. REFERENCE: ANSI B30.11-1998, Section 11-2.2, Paragraph 11- 2.2.2. Load tests. NOTE:Among other methods of abatement, one feasible and acceptable method to abate this hazard is to conduct load tests on all hoists in the facility as required by the above referenced standard.d
95012901
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $688
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a)Receiving Inspection Department -- a C-Hook under-the- hook lifting device was not labeled as to the maximum weight it could support. REFERENCE: ANSI B30.20-1985, Section 20-1.2, Paragraph 20- 1.2.1. Markings. NOTE:Among other methods of abatement, one feasible and acceptable method to abate this hazard is to properly label the C-Hook.y
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S) $688.00
95012901
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $963
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a)facility wide -- under-the-hook lifting devices throughout the facility were not inspected frequently as defined in the ANSI standard referenced below . REFERENCE: ANSI B30.20-1985, Section 20-1.2, Paragraph 20- 1.3.2. Frequent Inspections. NOTE:Among other methods of abatement, one feasible and acceptable method to abate this hazard is to inspect each under-the-hook lifting device in the facility as required by the above referenced standard.d
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S) $963.00
95012901
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $963
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a)facility wide -- under-the-hook lifting devices, such as a C-Hook in the Receiving Inspection Department and throughout the facility, were not inspected periodically as defined in the ANSI standard referenced below . REFERENCE: ANSI B30.20-1985, Section 20-1.3, Paragraph 20- 1.3.3. Periodic Inspections. NOTE:Among other methods of abatement, one feasible and acceptable method to abate this hazard is to inspect each under-the-hook lifting device in the facility as required by the above referenced standard.d
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S) $963.00
95012901
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $963
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a)facility wide -- under-the-hook lifting devices, such as a C-Hook in the Receiving Inspection Department and throughout the facility, were not load tested as defined in the ANSI standard referenced below . REFERENCE: ANSI B30.20-1985, Section 20-1.4, Paragraph 20- 1.4.2. Periodic Inspections. NOTE:Among other methods of abatement, one feasible and acceptable method to abate this hazard is to load test each under-the-hook lifting device in the facility as required by the above referenced standard.d
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S) $963.00
95012901
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $963 · Current $963
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a)salt pot and isostatic molding departments -- monorail hoists were not provided with stops to prevent the hoists from strike each other or an obstruction during use. REFERENCE:ANSI B30.11-1998, Section 11-1.3, Paragraph 11-1.3.1, Subparagraph (g). NOTE:Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method of abatement of this hazard is to install stops for all hoists on the monorail systems.
1910.179 J01 I
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $963 · Current $963
1910.179 J02
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
1910.179 J02 III
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
1910.179 J02 IV
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
1910.179 J03
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
1910.179 K01 I
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
1910.179 M01
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
1910.179 N04 I
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
1910.184 I09 III
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $688
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S) $688.00
1910.212 A02
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $688 · Current $688
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $688
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S) $688.00
1910.22 D01
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
1910.157 C04
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
1910.176 B
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
1910.178 K01
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
1910.179 G01 V
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
1910.212 B
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
1910.303 G01 II
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
1910.334 A02 I
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2001
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2001
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
Jan 5, 2012
Bruce D. Bowman · SCHENECTADY, NY
Jan 25, 2005
KGC, INC. · BILLINGS, MT
Dec 31, 2002
Rockaway Borough DPW · ROCKAWAY, NJ
Dec 31, 2002
Harry Brickey DBA a. Brickey Ceiling Company · FOREST CITY, NC
Dec 31, 2002
Sudden Bond Industries · EDGERTON, KS
More inspections in NC
Aug 7, 2026
161712 - Insight Electrical Construction LLC · KERNERSVILLE, NC
Aug 7, 2026
161711 - Ridgeland Construction - Remodeling L.L.C · KERNERSVILLE, NC
Aug 7, 2026
161709 - JCC Roofing LLC · GREENSBORO, NC
Aug 7, 2026
161706 - Obsidian Construction Group, LLC · KERNERSVILLE, NC
Aug 7, 2026
161705 - Webster - Sons Plumbing, INC. · KERNERSVILLE, NC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 304637630.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.