Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: AHMAD ABDULLAH DBA ATLANTIC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AHMAD ABDULLAH DBA ATLANTIC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY in 11431 JAMES JACK DRIVE, CHARLOTTE, NC 28277 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 304689318.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ahmad Abdullah DBA Atlantic Construction Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ahmad Abdullah DBA Atlantic Construction Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11431 JAMES JACK DRIVE
City
CHARLOTTE
State
NC
ZIP
28277
Mailing
5924 CABELL VIEW COURT, CHARLOTTE, NC 28277
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
1751
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Construction safety.

3 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Serious 5 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 6, 2001
Abate by
Aug 9, 2001
Penalty
Initial $125 · Current $125
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed
to:
a)jobsite, platform for personnel used with forklift as not
secured to the forklift.
b)Jobsite, platform for personnel use had no side rails.
c)jobsite, area was not marked off by cones or safety tape
to warn of work by elevated personnel.
d)jobsite, employee used platform planking to descend from
roof to platform.
e)the platform was at times tilted back instead of
remaining level during the lift.
Reference: ASME B56.1-14.17.3
b)the platform attachment means are applied and the
platform is securely attached to the lifting carriage or
forks.
c)when the lifting carriage and/or forks are supporting the
platform used to elevate personnel, the lifting carriage
and/or forks are secured to prevent them from pivoting
upward.
e)the platform is horizontal and centered and not tilted
forward or rearward when elevated.
r)lower platform to floor level for personnel to enter and
exit.  Do not climb on any part of the truck in
attempting to enter and exit.
NOTE:One method to abate this condition is to build or rent a
platform as described in ASME B56.1.

1926.501 B13

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 6, 2001
Abate by
Aug 9, 2001
Penalty
Initial $125 · Current $125

1926.416 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 6, 2001
Abate by
Aug 9, 2001

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 304689318.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.