Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: SUPREME TREE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SUPREME TREE, INC. in 105 WEST D STREET, ERWIN, NC 28339 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 304740004.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Supreme Tree, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Supreme Tree, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SUPREME TREE, INC.
Site address
105 WEST D STREET
City
ERWIN
State
NC
ZIP
28339
Mailing
202 MASONIC ROAD, ERWIN, NC 28339
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
0783
Employees
4
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

3 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Serious 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2001
Abate by
Nov 14, 2001
Penalty
Initial $250 · Current $100 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to
each of his employees  conditions of employment and a place of
employment free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely
to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that
employees were exposed to:
a)site - employees operating chain saw wearing chaps that
were damaged.
Ref:  29 CFR 1910.266 (d)(1)(ii)
Among other methods a feasible and acceptable abatement method
is to replace the damaged chaps.
b)site - employees operating a chain saw and the employer
did not provide cut resistant shoes.
Ref: 29 CFR 1910.266 (d)(1)(v)
Among other methods a feasible and acceptable abatement method
is to provide proper foot wear and require employees to wear
it.
c)site - employees operating a Stihl 990 chain saw that was
not equipped with a chain guard.
Ref: 1910.266 (e)(1)(ii)
Among other methods a feasible and acceptable abatement method
is to have the chain guard replaced on the saw.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $100.00
  • · Z (S) $250.00

1910.133 A01

Serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2001
Abate by
Nov 14, 2001
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.180 D06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2001
Abate by
Nov 14, 2001
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O)
  • · Z (O)

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 304740004.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.