Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: NC STEEL, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NC STEEL, INC. in 8005 FAYETTEVILLE ROAD, RALEIGH, NC 27603 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 304782857.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch NC Steel, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for NC Steel, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NC STEEL, INC.
Site address
8005 FAYETTEVILLE ROAD
City
RALEIGH
State
NC
ZIP
27603
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
3441
Employees
20
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

14 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2001
Abate by
Oct 29, 2001
Penalty
Initial $100 · Current $100
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed
to:
a)rebar work area -- a Wright 6000 pound hoist, used to
lift bundles of rebar, was not provided with frequent
inspections.
Reference:ANSI B30.11-1998; Paragraph 11-2.1.2
Frequent Inspection.  Frequent
inspections shall be performed at
intervals defined in paragraph 11-
2.1(b)(1) and shall include observations
during operation.
NOTE:Among other methods, one feasible and
acceptable method to correct this hazard is to
have the hoist inspected frequently by each
operator before use.re

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2001
Abate by
Oct 29, 2001
Penalty
Initial $100 · Current $100
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed
to:
a)rebar work area -- a Wright 6000 pound hoist, used to
lift bundles of rebar, was not provided with periodic
inspections.
Reference:ANSI B30.11-1998; Paragraph 11-2.1.3
Periodic Inspection.  Periodic
inspections shall be performed at
intervals defined in paragraph 11-
2.1(b)(2).
NOTE:Among other methods, one feasible and
acceptable method to correct this hazard is to
have the hoist inspected frequently, with
documentation.

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2001
Abate by
Oct 29, 2001
Penalty
Initial $100 · Current $100
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed
to:
a)rebar work area -- an upper limit switch was not
operational on a Wright 6000 pound monorail hoist used to
lift bundles of rebar weighing up to 5000 pounds.
Reference:ANSI B30.16-1981; paragraph 16-2.3.3(b)
Adjustment shall be made to assure
correct functioning of components.
NOTE:Among other methods of correcting this hazard
is to repair the upper limit switch and ensure
it is working properly before each use.

1910.184 D

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2001
Abate by
Oct 29, 2001
Penalty
Initial $100 · Current $100

1910.184 E01

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2001
Abate by
Oct 29, 2001

1910.184 E03 I

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2001
Abate by
Oct 29, 2001

1910.184 E04

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2001
Abate by
Oct 29, 2001

1910.243 C03

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2001
Abate by
Oct 19, 2001
Penalty
Initial $100 · Current $100

1910.304 F04

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2001
Abate by
Oct 19, 2001
Penalty
Initial $100 · Current $100

1910.179 B05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2001
Abate by
Oct 29, 2001

1910.179 L03 IIID

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2001
Abate by
Oct 29, 2001

1910.303 F

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2001
Abate by
Oct 29, 2001

1910.305 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2001
Abate by
Oct 29, 2001

1910.305 G02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2001
Abate by
Oct 29, 2001

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 304782857.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.