RIFLE, CO —
OSHA Inspection: SMITH PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of SMITH PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION in S. OF RIFLE, CO, RIFLE, CO 81650 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 304976509.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SMITH PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- S. OF RIFLE, CO
- City
- RIFLE
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 81650
- Mailing
- PO BOX 345, FT. LUPTON, CO 80621
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4922
- Employees
- 48
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2002
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck-by hazards: (a) Smith Pipeline Construction Inc., at Encana gas pipeline, south of Rifle, CO: On or before April 26, 2002, the employer, acting as both exposing employer and controlling employer, did not ensure that employees working in the area of Caterpillar excavator model 325B excavator remained outstide of the swing radius of the bucket, thereby exposing two of its own employees, and two employees of another contractor, to serious injury or death by being struck by the excavator bucket. The hazard posed by swinging buckets is plainly obvious and described in industy safety literature and in the manufacturer's operating instructions. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct these hazards can be found in SAE J153, Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice, Section 7.10 Operating Precautions which instructs operators to watch for bystanders and to never allow anyone to be under or to reach through the machine and its equipment while operating. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (See enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter").-Certification
1926.602 A09 II
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2002
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $875
1926.652 A01
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2002
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $875
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 304976509.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.