Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SMITH PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of SMITH PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION in S. OF RIFLE, CO, RIFLE, CO 81650 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 304976509.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Smith Pipeline Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Smith Pipeline Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
S. OF RIFLE, CO
City
RIFLE
State
CO
ZIP
81650
Mailing
PO BOX 345, FT. LUPTON, CO 80621
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
4922
Employees
48
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 4, 2002
Abate by
Jun 9, 2002
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not
furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment
which were free
from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm
to employees in that employees were exposed to struck-by hazards:
(a) Smith Pipeline Construction Inc., at Encana gas pipeline, south of
Rifle, CO:
On or before April 26, 2002, the employer, acting as both exposing
employer and
controlling employer, did not ensure that employees working in the area of
Caterpillar
excavator model 325B excavator remained outstide of the swing radius of
the bucket,
thereby exposing two of its own employees, and two employees of another
contractor,
to serious injury or death by being struck by the excavator bucket. The
hazard posed
by swinging buckets is plainly obvious and described in industy safety
literature and
in the manufacturer's operating instructions.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct these
hazards can be found in SAE J153, Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice,
Section
7.10 Operating Precautions which instructs operators to watch for
bystanders and to
never allow anyone to be under or to reach through the machine and its
equipment
while operating.
Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for
this item (See
enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter").-Certification

1926.602 A09 II

Serious Gravity 03 7 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 4, 2002
Abate by
Jun 12, 2002
Penalty
Initial $875 · Current $875

1926.652 A01

Serious Gravity 03 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 4, 2002
Abate by
Jun 9, 2002
Penalty
Initial $875 · Current $875

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 304976509.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.