BOSTON, MA —
OSHA Inspection: UNICCO INTEGRATED FACILITIES SERVICES
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of UNICCO INTEGRATED FACILITIES SERVICES in 2 CENTRE PLAZA, BOSTON, MA 02119 (NAICS 561720). OSHA activity number 305549388.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- UNICCO INTEGRATED FACILITIES SERVICES
- Site address
- 2 CENTRE PLAZA
- City
- BOSTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02119
- Mailing
- 275 GROVE STREET SUITE 3-200, AUBURNDALE, MA 02466
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561720
- SIC code (legacy)
- 7349
- Employees
- 100
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety & Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were exposed to a fall hazard. (a) Location: Centre Plaza, Pemberton Square, Boston On 05/15/03, The anchorages for personal fall arrest systems and descent control devices consisted of a singe 5/16 inch horizontal wire rope static line and this single line was improperly secured, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards. Among other means, feasible means of abatement would be: 1) Anchorage points for personal fall protection must be independent of the descent control device and its support system, and the horizontal lifeline must be adequate for the intended load. 2) Consult a qualified professional engineer to design a horizontal line and determine that it is capable of supporting the anchorage load factor by horizontal dynamic loading of the cable, based on the nominal strength of the wire rope and end terminations. 3) Ensure a competent person follows the manufacturer's instructions for wire rope clips regarding proper arrangement of the wire rope clips, correct spacing between each clip, and installation torque when forming turnback eyes. Always include the use of thimbles when forming eyes with wire rope clips, and ensure that malleable cast iron clips shall not be used. 4) Implement a comprehensive safety program that includes hands on employee training in the proper use of approved rigging, fall protection systems, and rescue techniques. 5) Perform an evaluation of all English speaking and non-English speaking employees to have full comprehension of the company safety training manual, manufacturer's instructions, warnings and design limitations of the RDS equipment and ANSI/IWCA I- 14.1 2001 standard, and related safety regulations. 6) Ensure supervisors are qualified and proficient in safe working procedures and training in the use of equipment in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, warnings and design limitations. 7) Ensure a competent person inspects all anchor points and rigging being used prior to the start of work, before each use, and ensure all working practices and procedures for window cleaning operations are performed under supervision of a competent person. 8) Remove from service all wire rope with distorted structure such as crushed or kinking conditions. 9) Submit a Plan of Service to the building owner or his agent to address all safety concerns and to identify the use of anchorage points, prior to the service being performed. Nothing precludes the company from using alternative abatement methods which are as equally or more protective for the employee.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.132 C
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2003
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.132 E
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.145 C03
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1904.7
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2003
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Unicco Integrated Facilities Services
View Unicco Integrated Facilities Services's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561720)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 305549388.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.