Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: UNICCO INTEGRATED FACILITIES SERVICES

Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of UNICCO INTEGRATED FACILITIES SERVICES in 2 CENTRE PLAZA, BOSTON, MA 02119 (NAICS 561720). OSHA activity number 305549388.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Unicco Integrated Facilities Services — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Unicco Integrated Facilities Services is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2 CENTRE PLAZA
City
BOSTON
State
MA
ZIP
02119
Mailing
275 GROVE STREET SUITE 3-200, AUBURNDALE, MA 02466
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Y
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561720
SIC code (legacy)
7349
Employees
100
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2003
Abate by
Dec 1, 2003
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety & Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized
hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in
that employees were
exposed to a fall hazard.
(a) Location: Centre Plaza, Pemberton Square, Boston
On 05/15/03, The anchorages for personal fall arrest systems and descent
control devices
consisted of a singe 5/16 inch horizontal wire rope static line and this
single line was
improperly secured, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.
Among other means, feasible means of abatement would be:
1) Anchorage points for personal fall protection must be independent of
the descent
control device and its support system, and the horizontal lifeline must be
adequate for
the intended load.
2) Consult a qualified professional engineer to design a horizontal line
and determine that
it is capable of supporting the anchorage load factor by horizontal
dynamic loading of the
cable, based on the nominal strength of the wire rope and end terminations.
3) Ensure a competent person follows the manufacturer's instructions for
wire rope clips
regarding proper arrangement of the wire rope clips, correct spacing
between each clip,
and installation torque when forming turnback eyes. Always include the use
of thimbles
when forming eyes with wire rope clips, and ensure that malleable cast
iron clips shall
not be used.
4) Implement a comprehensive safety program that includes hands on
employee training
in the proper use of approved rigging, fall protection systems, and rescue
techniques.
5) Perform an evaluation of all English speaking and non-English speaking
employees
to have full comprehension of the company safety training manual,
manufacturer's
instructions, warnings and design limitations of the RDS equipment and
ANSI/IWCA I-
14.1 2001 standard, and related safety regulations.
6) Ensure supervisors are qualified and proficient in safe working
procedures and training
in the use of equipment in accordance with the manufacturer's
instructions, warnings and
design limitations.
7) Ensure a competent person inspects all anchor points and rigging being
used prior to
the start of work, before each use, and ensure all working practices and
procedures for
window cleaning operations are performed under supervision of a competent
person.
8) Remove from service all wire rope with distorted structure such as
crushed or kinking
conditions.
9) Submit a Plan of Service to the building owner or his agent to address
all safety
concerns and to identify the use of anchorage points, prior to the service
being
performed.
Nothing precludes the company from using alternative abatement methods
which are as
equally or more protective for the employee.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7000.00
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.132 A

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2003
Abate by
Dec 1, 2003
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $7000.00
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.132 C

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2003
Abate by
Oct 24, 2003
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7000.00
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.132 E

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 5 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2003
Abate by
Dec 1, 2003
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $7000.00
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.145 C03

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2003
Abate by
Dec 1, 2003
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500.00
  • — Z (S) $2500.00

1904.7

Other-than-serious Gravity 00 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2003
Abate by
Dec 1, 2003
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

View Unicco Integrated Facilities Services's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 305549388.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.