Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: SHOREWOOD PACKAGING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SHOREWOOD PACKAGING, INC. in 200 TABOR ROAD, EAST FLAT ROCK, NC 28726 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 305623423.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Shorewood Packaging, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Shorewood Packaging, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
200 TABOR ROAD
City
EAST FLAT ROCK
State
NC
ZIP
28726
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
2657
Employees
207
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

15 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2002
Abate by
Oct 15, 2002
Penalty
Initial $413 · Current $207 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health
Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to each of his
employees
conditions of employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious
physical harm to employees:
a)facility wide -- below-the-hook lifting devices were not tested
prior to their initial use.
REFERENCE:  ANSI B30.20-1985, Chapter 20-1.4, Testing
Prior to initial use, all new, altered, modified, or
repaired lifting devices shall be tested to ensure
compliance with this standard.
NOTE:Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct
this hazard is to have all below-the-hook lifting devices tested.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $206.50
  • · Z (S) $413.00

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2002
Abate by
Oct 15, 2002
Penalty
Initial $413 · Current $207 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health
Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to each of his
employees
conditions of employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious
physical harm to employees:
a)facility wide -- below-the-hook lifting devices were not marked
with the rated load of the device on the main structure where it
is visible.
REFERENCE:ANSI B30.20-1985, Chapter 20-1, Section 20-1.2, Markings and
Construction, Paragraph 20-1.2.1, Markings
The rated load of the lifting device shall be marked on the
main structure where it is visible.
NOTE:Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct
this hazard is to label all below-the-hook lifting devices with
their rated loads as outlined in the above listed reference.hook
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $206.50
  • · Z (S) $413.00

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2002
Abate by
Oct 15, 2002
Penalty
Initial $413 · Current $207 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North
Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to each of his employees
conditions of employment and a
place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to
cause death or serious physical harm to employees:
a)facility wide -- periodic inspections were not being conducted on
overhead hoists
and their supporting structures.
REFERENCE:ANSI B30.16-1981, Chapter 16-2, Section 16-2.1, Inspecting,
Paragraph 16-2.1.3, Periodic Inspection
NOTE:Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct
this
hazard is to conduct periodic inspections on all overhead hoists as
outlined
in the above listed reference.s
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $206.50
  • · Z (S) $413.00

95012901

Deleted Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2002
Abate by
Oct 15, 2002
Penalty
Initial $413 · Current $413
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not
furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a
place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)facility wide -- upper limit switches on all overhead
hoists in the facility were/are not being tested before
each operator's shift.
REFERENCE:ANSI B30.11-1998, Section 11-2.2, Testing,
Paragraph 11-2.2.1, Operational Tests
NOTE:Among other methods of abatement of this hazard is
to test each hoist upper limit switch before each
operator's shift.
OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE:
29 CFR 1910.179(n)(4)(i):  At the beginning of each operator's
shift the upper limit switch of each hoist was not tried out
under no load.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $413.00
  • · Z (S) $413.00

1910.213 I01

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2002
Abate by
Sep 18, 2002
Penalty
Initial $688 · Current $344 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $344.00
  • · Z (S) $688.00

1910.215 B09

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2002
Abate by
Sep 18, 2002
Penalty
Initial $688 · Current $344 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $344.00
  • · Z (S) $688.00

1910.304 F04

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2002
Abate by
Sep 13, 2002
Penalty
Initial $963 · Current $482 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $481.50
  • · Z (S) $963.00

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2002
Abate by
Oct 15, 2002

1910.179 J02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2002
Abate by
Oct 15, 2002

1910.212 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2002
Abate by
Sep 18, 2002

1910.303 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2002
Abate by
Sep 13, 2002

1910.303 F

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2002
Abate by
Sep 18, 2002

1910.303 G01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2002
Abate by
Sep 18, 2002

1910.305 G01 IIIA

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2002
Abate by
Sep 13, 2002

1910.305 G02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2002
Abate by
Sep 18, 2002

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 305623423.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.