ST. LOUIS, MO —
OSHA Inspection: AMERICAN AIRLINES
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AMERICAN AIRLINES in 10900 LAMBERT INTERNATIONAL DRIVE, ST. LOUIS, MO 63145 (NAICS 481111). OSHA activity number 305632697.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AMERICAN AIRLINES
- Site address
- 10900 LAMBERT INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
- City
- ST. LOUIS
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63145
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 10128 (ATTN: B. JAGGI), ST. LOUIS, MO 63145
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 481111
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4512
- Employees
- 5000
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2003
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employmnent and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a struck by hazard of an air hose: a)D Concourse, on or about May 23 and May 26, 2003, employees were exposed to a struck by hazard caused by the whipping action of the air hose as they were attempting to disconnect the hose from the airplane. The air hose was still pressurized (40 psi) due to the switching of the main controls to the manual position. Employees had no way of determining that the main controls had been set on the manual mode. Their controls were in the automatic mode. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method is to ensure that the controls are synchronized to the same settings. Another feasible method of abatement is to develop and implement a procedure for determining the amount of air pressure in the hose by the possible installation of an air pressure gauge. Another feasible method of abatement is to secure the main control panel to the system and limit the access to authorized personnel in addition to the first and/or second method. DISCLAIMER a)The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
More inspections at American Airlines
View American Airlines's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 481111)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 305632697.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.