Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AMERICAN AIRLINES

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AMERICAN AIRLINES in 10900 LAMBERT INTERNATIONAL DRIVE, ST. LOUIS, MO 63145 (NAICS 481111). OSHA activity number 305632697.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch American Airlines — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for American Airlines is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Site address
10900 LAMBERT INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
City
ST. LOUIS
State
MO
ZIP
63145
Mailing
P.O. BOX 10128 (ATTN: B. JAGGI), ST. LOUIS, MO 63145
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Y
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
481111
SIC code (legacy)
4512
Employees
5000
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2003
Abate by
Sep 25, 2003
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employmnent and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to a struck by hazard of an air hose:
a)D Concourse, on or about May 23 and May 26, 2003, employees were exposed
to a
struck by hazard caused by the whipping action of the air hose as they
were attempting
to disconnect the hose from the airplane.  The air hose was still
pressurized (40 psi) due
to the switching of the  main controls to the manual position.  Employees
had no way
of determining that the main controls had been set on the manual mode.
Their controls
were in the automatic mode.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method is to
ensure that
the controls are synchronized to the same settings.
Another feasible method of abatement is to develop and implement a
procedure for
determining the amount of air pressure in the hose by the possible
installation of an air
pressure gauge.
Another feasible method of abatement is to secure the main control panel
to the system
and limit the access to authorized personnel in addition to the first
and/or second method.
DISCLAIMER
a)The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA.
b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective
abatement method.
Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this
violation.  The
documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable
measurements
or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be
helpful.  The
abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations(s).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500.00
  • — Z (S) $3500.00

View American Airlines's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 305632697.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.