Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BILL WHALEY (DBA) WHALEY FARMS

Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of BILL WHALEY (DBA) WHALEY FARMS in 296 VINE SWAMP RD., KINSTON, NC 28504 (NAICS 111920). OSHA activity number 305725780.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bill Whaley (DBA) Whaley Farms — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bill Whaley (DBA) Whaley Farms is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
296 VINE SWAMP RD.
City
KINSTON
State
NC
ZIP
28504
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
111920
SIC code (legacy)
0131
Employees
12
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

5 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2002
Abate by
Dec 30, 2002
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina:  The
employer did not furnish to each of his employees  conditions of
employment and a place of employment free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious
physical harm to employees, in that employees
were exposed to:
a)establishment - employees have not received training in the operation of
industrial trucks.
"Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is train all
employees that operate industrial trucks in the correct procedures for
their operation."
Or, in the alternative;
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii):  Prior to permitting an employee to operate a
powered industrial truck, the employer did
not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the necessary
training.
a)establishment - employees have not received training in the operation of
industrial trucks.

95012901

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2002
Abate by
Dec 30, 2002
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina:  The
employer did not furnish to each of his employees  conditions of
employment and a place of employment free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious
physical harm to employees, in that employees
were exposed to:
a)establishment - Yale diesel powered fork lift was left unattended
without the loaded forks lowered, the brake
set, the motor off or within 25 feet of the operator.
"Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to train
employees that will operate industrial trucks in the proper operation of
the vehicle."
Or, in the alternative
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(5)(i):  Powered industrial trucks were left unattended
without lowering the forks, setting the
brake or turning the motor off:
a)establishment - Yale diesel powered fork lift was left unattended
without the loaded forks lowered, the brake
set, the motor off or within 25 feet of the operator.

95012901

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2002
Abate by
Dec 30, 2002
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina: The
employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment
and a place of employment free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious
physical harm to employees, in that employees
were exposed to:
a)establishment - no written certification of forklift training.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to maintain
written certification of training."
Or, in the alternative;
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer failed to certify that each operator
has been trained and evaluated as required by
this paragraph (l).
a)establishment - no written certification to indicate employees had been
properly trained.

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2002
Abate by
Dec 30, 2002
Penalty
Initial $150 · Current $150
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina: The
employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment
and a place of employment free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious
physical harm to employees, in that employees
were exposed to:
a)establishment - oak pallet used as a personnel lifting platform, was not
secured
to the forks.
"Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is securely attach
any appropriate walking/working surface to the lifting forks."
Or, in the alternative;
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(12)(i):  Safety platform(s) on powered industrial
truck(s) were not firmly secured to the lifting
carriage or forks:
a)establishment - oak pallet used as a personnel lifting platform, was not
secured to the forks.

95012901

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2002
Abate by
Dec 30, 2002
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina:  The
employer did not furnish to each of his employees  conditions of
employment and a place of employment free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious
physical harm to employees, in that employees
were exposed to:
a)establishment - Yale diesel powered industrial truck did not have a
functioning horn or other audible warning
system.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to inspect
industrial trucks prior to operation of the vehicle."
Or, in the alternative;
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1):  Powered industrial trucks that were in need of
repairs, defective or in any way unsafe, were
placed into service without repair.
a)establishment - Yale diesel powered industrial truck did not have a
functioning horn or other audible warning
system.

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 305725780.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.