KINSTON, NC —
OSHA Inspection: BILL WHALEY (DBA) WHALEY FARMS
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of BILL WHALEY (DBA) WHALEY FARMS in 296 VINE SWAMP RD., KINSTON, NC 28504 (NAICS 111920). OSHA activity number 305725780.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BILL WHALEY (DBA) WHALEY FARMS
- Site address
- 296 VINE SWAMP RD.
- City
- KINSTON
- State
- NC
- ZIP
- 28504
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 111920
- SIC code (legacy)
- 0131
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
95012901
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2002
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were exposed to: a)establishment - employees have not received training in the operation of industrial trucks. "Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is train all employees that operate industrial trucks in the correct procedures for their operation." Or, in the alternative; 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): Prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck, the employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the necessary training. a)establishment - employees have not received training in the operation of industrial trucks.
95012901
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2002
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2002
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were exposed to: a)establishment - Yale diesel powered fork lift was left unattended without the loaded forks lowered, the brake set, the motor off or within 25 feet of the operator. "Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to train employees that will operate industrial trucks in the proper operation of the vehicle." Or, in the alternative 29 CFR 1910.178(m)(5)(i): Powered industrial trucks were left unattended without lowering the forks, setting the brake or turning the motor off: a)establishment - Yale diesel powered fork lift was left unattended without the loaded forks lowered, the brake set, the motor off or within 25 feet of the operator.
95012901
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2002
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2002
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were exposed to: a)establishment - no written certification of forklift training. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to maintain written certification of training." Or, in the alternative; 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer failed to certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l). a)establishment - no written certification to indicate employees had been properly trained.
95012901
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2002
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $150 · Current $150
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were exposed to: a)establishment - oak pallet used as a personnel lifting platform, was not secured to the forks. "Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is securely attach any appropriate walking/working surface to the lifting forks." Or, in the alternative; 29 CFR 1910.178(m)(12)(i): Safety platform(s) on powered industrial truck(s) were not firmly secured to the lifting carriage or forks: a)establishment - oak pallet used as a personnel lifting platform, was not secured to the forks.
95012901
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2002
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2002
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were exposed to: a)establishment - Yale diesel powered industrial truck did not have a functioning horn or other audible warning system. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to inspect industrial trucks prior to operation of the vehicle." Or, in the alternative; 29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial trucks that were in need of repairs, defective or in any way unsafe, were placed into service without repair. a)establishment - Yale diesel powered industrial truck did not have a functioning horn or other audible warning system.
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 111920)
More inspections in NC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 305725780.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.