CONOVER, NC ·
OSHA Inspection: BARLOWORLD IND.DIST.INC DBA BARLOWORLD HANDLING LP
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of BARLOWORLD IND.DIST.INC DBA BARLOWORLD HANDLING LP in 1229 SW COMMERCE ST., CONOVER, NC 28613 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 306136102.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BARLOWORLD IND.DIST.INC DBA BARLOWORLD HANDLING LP
- Site address
- 1229 SW COMMERCE ST.
- City
- CONOVER
- State
- NC
- ZIP
- 28613
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 5084
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing health.
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
95012901
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,625
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a)maintenance shop, employer did not have a load test performed on an underhung single girder crane to confirm the load rating of the system. REFERENCE: ANSI B30.11-2.2.2 b)maintenance shop, employer did not establish a procedure or train operators to perform frequent inspections of the crane. REFERENCE: ANSI B30.11-2.1.2 c)maintenance shop, employer did not establish a procedure for periodic inspections to be performed at intervals as defined in ANSI B30.11-2.1.1(b)(2) for severe service (daily to weekly use). REFERENCE: ANSI B30.11-2.1.3 NOTE: Among other methods, a feasible and acceptable method for abatement would be to have a load test performed, and to establish an inspection process that incorporates these requirements as well as any other recognized industry standards relating to cranes and hoists.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S) $1625.00
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Mar 8, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $813 · Current $813
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Mar 8, 2003
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2003
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2003
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in NC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 306136102.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.