Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: BARLOWORLD IND.DIST.INC DBA BARLOWORLD HANDLING LP

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of BARLOWORLD IND.DIST.INC DBA BARLOWORLD HANDLING LP in 1229 SW COMMERCE ST., CONOVER, NC 28613 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 306136102.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Barloworld Ind.Dist.Inc DBA Barloworld Handling LP for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Barloworld Ind.Dist.Inc DBA Barloworld Handling LP is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1229 SW COMMERCE ST.
City
CONOVER
State
NC
ZIP
28613
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
5084
Employees
20
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Manufacturing health.

5 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Serious 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2003
Abate by
Mar 24, 2003
Penalty
Initial $1,625
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed
to:
a)maintenance shop, employer did not have a load test
performed on an underhung single girder crane to confirm
the load rating of the system.
REFERENCE:  ANSI B30.11-2.2.2
b)maintenance shop, employer did not establish a procedure
or train operators to perform frequent inspections of the
crane.
REFERENCE:  ANSI B30.11-2.1.2
c)maintenance shop, employer did not establish a procedure
for periodic inspections to be performed at intervals as
defined in ANSI B30.11-2.1.1(b)(2) for severe service
(daily to weekly use).
REFERENCE:  ANSI B30.11-2.1.3
NOTE:  Among other methods, a feasible and acceptable method
for abatement would be to have a load test performed, and to
establish an inspection process that incorporates these
requirements as well as any other recognized industry
standards relating to cranes and hoists.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S) $1625.00

1910.215 B09

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2003
Abate by
Mar 8, 2003
Penalty
Initial $813 · Current $813

1910.215 A04

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2003
Abate by
Mar 8, 2003

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2003
Abate by
Mar 24, 2003

1910.1200 F05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2003
Abate by
Mar 24, 2003

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 306136102.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.