NEW YORK, NY —
OSHA Inspection: HIGH RISE ELECTRIC, INC.
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of HIGH RISE ELECTRIC, INC. in 90 WASHINGTON ST., NEW YORK, NY 10006 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 306442104.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HIGH RISE ELECTRIC, INC.
- Site address
- 90 WASHINGTON ST.
- City
- NEW YORK
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10006
- Mailing
- 13-15 JACKSON AVE, LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11101
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238210
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1731
- Employees
- 17
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 5, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to electrical shock and burns: In the cellar switchroom in 90 Washington St., New York, N.Y. employees were upgrading the main Federal Pacific QMQB VL-9036 switchgear that involved the installation of copper adapters to aluminum cables where they attached to the switch lugs for each phase as required by the Electrical Code of the City of New York Chapter 27-3025, on April 25, 2003. The employer used Insulated Rubber Blankets that were not in a di-electric testing program. Among other methods, a feasible means of abatement would be to use Insulated Rubber Blankets that were tested for di-electric integrity as required by the American Society for Testing and Materials F 479-95 Standard Specification for In-Service Care of Insulating Blankets. Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.ce
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1300.00
- — Z (S) $2000.00
1926.95 A
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 10, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,600 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2600.00
- — Z (S) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 5, 2003
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of arc flash and arc blast: In the cellar switchroom in 90 Washington St., New York, N.Y., employees were upgrading the main Federal Pacific QMQB VL-9036 switchgear that involved the installation of copper adapters to aluminum cables where they attached to the switch lugs for each phase as required by the Electrical Code of the City of New York Chapter 27-3025, on April 25, 2003. This procedure required the employees to approach approximately 30 inches from bus energized to 480 Volts phase to phase. The employer proceeded with work on live parts not placed in electrically safe work conditions, without performing a Flash Hazard Analysis and without using safety related work practices based on the determined hazard such as the use of PPE appropriate for protection from an arc flash. Among other methods, a feasible means of abatement for work on equipment not placed in a safe condition, would be to perform a Flash Hazard Analysis to determine the approach distance within which protective equipment should be used, and if work is required within that boundary, to provide employees with that equipment such as fire rated long sleeve shirt and pants or coveralls, a switching hood, and leather gloves or voltage rated gloves, to protect against flash hazards such as shockwave and burns, in accordance with Part II of National Fire Protection Association Standard for Electrical Safety Requirements for Employee Workplaces 2000 Edition, Chapters 2-1.3.2 and 2-1.3.3. Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 5, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,600 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2600.00
- — Z (S) $4000.00
1926.416 D
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 5, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,600 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2600.00
- — Z (S) $4000.00
More inspections at High Rise Electric, INC.
View High Rise Electric, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238210)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 306442104.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.