RUMFORD, ME —
OSHA Inspection: MEAD WESTVACO
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MEAD WESTVACO in 35 HARTFORD STREET, RUMFORD, ME 04276 (NAICS 322121). OSHA activity number 306535667.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MEAD WESTVACO
- Site address
- 35 HARTFORD STREET
- City
- RUMFORD
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04276
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 322121
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2621
- Employees
- 1100
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2004
- Abate by
- Mar 30, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing injuries from the collapse of an unsafe structure and burns and smoke inhalation from fire: Building 45 - R15 Maintenance Building - On or about January 20, 2004, employees were potentially exposed to the collapse of the roof and building caused by excess ice build-up on the roof. The subsequent fire destroyed the building, exposing employees to fire and smoke inhalation. The collapse, although potentially catastrophic, resulted in no serious injuries. ABATEMENT NOTE: One feasible method to abate this may be to remove accumulations of ice when the design limitations of the roof are exceeded. The following conditions and circumstances contributed to the incident - the roof collapse due to ice build-up. With reasonable diligence the employer could have known of these conditions and circumstances and addressed and abated them to prevent the incident from occurring. 1. Inadequate roof inspection by the current Buildings and Grounds Manager. 2. Inadequate training of the current Buildings and Grounds manager in roof inspection procedures by the previous Buildings and Grounds engineer. 3. The non-response to the roof leak at the point of danger -- the roof valley in the northwest corner of Building 45 -- that was reported to the current Buildings and Grounds manager on or about January 14, 2004, six days prior to the accident. In the document "Roof Maintenance Plan" developed by the Buildings and Grounds Engineer, the section on "Leak report / response:" stated that "Once a call has been received reporting a leak, it is the Buildings and Grounds Engineer (responsibility) to go to the site of the report and inspect the scene....If it is determined that the leak is caused by flaws in the roof or roof drains, the Buildings and Grounds Engineer will need to contract the required repairs." 4. The recognition that the Building 45 flash tank roof vent was discharging water, as evidenced by ice build up around the vent on the roofs of Building 45 and the Trimmer room and the outside walls of the Trimmer Room Building. The safety manager had ropped-off with danger tape the ground area around the vent at Building 45 and the Trimmer Room Building to keep pedestrians away from the area due to falling ice. 5. Water exhausting from other roof vents, including roof flash tank steam system vents, had previously been reduced by trouble-shooting and repairing the steam system. R-9 Pulp Dryer wet end steam roof vent was an example of a steam system for whichtrouble-shooting and repairs were done; the system was taken out of service to prevent ice build-up on the roof.-up
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2004
- Abate by
- Mar 18, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.165 B01
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2004
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.165 B05
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2004
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2004
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S)
1926.1101 G08 I
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2004
- Abate by
- Mar 18, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000.00
- — Z (S) $2000.00
1926.1101 E06
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2004
- Abate by
- Mar 18, 2004
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
More inspections at Mead Westvaco
View Mead Westvaco's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 322121)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 306535667.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.