SUGARCREEK, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: SUGARCREEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SUGARCREEK INDUSTRIES, INC. in 425 SOUTH BROADWAY AVENUE, SUGARCREEK, OH 44681 (NAICS 332321). OSHA activity number 306546235.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SUGARCREEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Site address
- 425 SOUTH BROADWAY AVENUE
- City
- SUGARCREEK
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44681
- Mailing
- PO BOX 460, SUGARCREEK, OH 44681
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332321
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3442
- Employees
- 187
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2004
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,475 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck-by and crushed-by hazards related to falling or dropped loads or objects during maintenance operations: On October 7, 2004, employees using a roof mounted winch were removing a hydraulic unit from a reciprocating paint line unit and lowering this load to the floor. Three sixteenths inch wire rope from the winch was formed into an eye or eye splice and connected to an eye hook threaded into the top of the hydraulic unit cylinder. A thimble was not used in the formation of the eye or eye splice wire rope termination. An employer fabricated fastener (referred to as the collar) was used to secure the wire rope eye or eye splice. During the removal of the hydraulic unit, as the load was being lowered to the floor, the fastener failed from the wire rope releasing the load. The load struck a paint line employee involved with the task causing serious injuries. Among other means, some feasible and acceptable methods to correct these hazards include; (1)Proper installation of wire rope terminations, such as swaged or poured wire rope sockets, mechanical spliced sleeve, hand tucked loop or thimble spliced, wedge socket, or clips. Installation is to be according to manufacturers guidelines or industry guidelines such as the Wire Rope Users Manual, Wire Rope Technical Board, third edition, pp. 33-44; (2)Proper installation of the appropriate sized thimble to the eye or eye splice to prevent kinking, crushing or other damage to the wire rope. Installation is to be according to manufacturers guidelines or industry guidelines such as the Wire Rope Users Manual, Wire Rope Technical Board, third edition, pp.34-35, 37 and 40; (3)Load testing of wire rope terminations; per manufacturers guidelines or as referenced by the Wire Rope Users Manual, Wire Rope Technical Board, third edition, pp. 37, 40 and 43; (4)Provide training and instructions, conducted by a person knowledgeable in the use of wire rope and rigging for employees required to use and/or install wire rope. Ensure that all inspections, adjustments and repairs are made by trained, designated personnel. Nothing precludes the company from using alternative abatement methods which are equally or more protective for the employee.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2475.00
- · Z (S) $4500.00
1910.24 H
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2004
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $1,125 · Current $619 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $618.75
- · Z (S) $1125.00
1910.27 C04
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2004
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $825 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $825.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.27 D03
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2004
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $825 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $825.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.184 C09
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2004
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $1,875 · Current $1,031 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1031.25
- · Z (S) $1875.00
1910.184 D
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2004
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $1,875 · Current $1,031 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1031.25
- · Z (S) $1875.00
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2004
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2004
8870
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
More inspections at Sugarcreek Industries, INC.
View Sugarcreek Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332321)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 306546235.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.