JONESBORO, AR —
OSHA Inspection: HANEY PAINTING CO., LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HANEY PAINTING CO., LLC in 524 CHURCH STREET, JONESBORO, AR 72401 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 306903873.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HANEY PAINTING CO., LLC
- Site address
- 524 CHURCH STREET
- City
- JONESBORO
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 72401
- Mailing
- 770 GREENE ROAD 725, PARAGOULD, AR 72450
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1721
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Construction safety.
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: On or about August 9 and August 22, 2003, at the jobsite located at 524 Church Street, in Jonesboro, Arkansas, employees working from a Grove AMZ 66 and a Genie S-60 manlifts were exposed to injuries from falls should the machines malfunction due to the user not causing an annual inspection to be performed on them. One feasible method of abatement, among others is to cause an inspection as outlined in Section 6.6 of the American National Standards Institute's Standard for Boom-supported Elevating Work Platforms. (ANSI A92.5 1992) ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION AND CERTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to falls: On or about August 9 an employee operating and working from a Grove AMZ 66 manlift and on or about August 22, 2003, employees operating and working from a Genie S-60 manlift at the jobsite located at 524 Church Street, in Jonesboro, Arkansas were exposed to injuries from falls because the employer directed or authorized employees to operate these aerial platforms and did not ensure that they had been properly trained. One feasible method of abatement,among others is to ensure that the operators have been trained in accordance with the manufacturer's operating and maintenance manual, the employer's work instructions, and with Section 8 of the American National Standards Institute Standard, Boom-Supported Elevating Work Platforms. (ANSI A92.5 1992) ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION AND CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to falls: On or about August 22, 2003, employees operating and working from a Genie S-60 manlift at the jobsite located at 524 Church Street, in Jonesboro, Arkansas were exposed to injuries from falls due to the aerial platform not being operated on a surface within the limits specified by the manufacturer. One feasible method of abatement, among others is to require the aerial platform to be used in accordance with Section 7.9(a) of the American National Standard Institute, Boom-Supported Elevating Work Platforms (ANSI A92,5-1992)
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 24, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: On or about August 22, 2003, employees operating and working from a Genie S-60 manlift at the jobsite located at 524 Church Street, Jonesboro, Arkansas were exposed to injuries from falls due to not being protected by the use of personal fall arrest systems. One feasible method of abatement, among others is to initiate and require the use of personal fall arrest systems in accordance with Section 8.8(g) of the American National Standard Institute, Boom Supported Elevating Work Platforms (ANSI A-92.5-1992)
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $750.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $750.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 3, 2003
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $750.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $750
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S) $750.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $750.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $1500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $1500.00
More inspections at Haney Painting CO., LLC
View Haney Painting CO., LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
More inspections in AR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 306903873.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.