MONTGOMERY, NY —
OSHA Inspection: MONTGOMERY VILL DPW
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MONTGOMERY VILL DPW in 69 BACHELOR ST, MONTGOMERY, NY 12549 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 306983925.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch Montgomery Vill DPW — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Montgomery Vill DPW is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MONTGOMERY VILL DPW
- Site address
- 69 BACHELOR ST
- City
- MONTGOMERY
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 12549
- Mailing
- 133 CLINTON AVE, MONTGOMERY, NY 12549
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237310
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1611
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- B
Citations
20 citations on file for this inspection.
3A0001
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2008
General-duty citation text
NYSLL Article 2, Section 27-a.3.a(1): The employer did not furnish to each of its employees, employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that are causing or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to its employees and which will provide reasonable and adequate protection to the lives, safety or health of its employees. In applying this paragraph, fundamental distinctions between private and public employment have been recognized. A reasonable and adequate abatement method, among others, would be for the employer to provide procedures for ensuring that employees are practicing safe work practices and for employer monitoring of equipment use. Justification for issuing a General Duty Clause (Section 27a) concerning the use of the refuse collection vehicle is that the employer did not furnish to each of its employees, employment, and a place of employment which is free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to its employees, and which will provide reasonable and adequate protection to lives, safety, or health of its employees. Specifically: a) Montgomery Vill DPW - The employer allowed 2 employees to ride the steps of a refuse collection truck while moving at a speed greater than 10 mph. The truck is a 2006 International cab and frame with a Pakmor dump body. This is not compliant with ANSI Z245.1-1999 and the NIOSH Alert for Preventing Worker Injuries and Deaths from Moving Refuse Collection Vehicles. A feasible and acceptable abatement method, among others, would be for the employer to develop and enforce a policy that prohibits employees from riding the steps while moving at speeds greater than 10 mph. Employees can ride either in the cab of the refuse vehicle or in a follow vehicle. b) Montgomery Vill DPW - The employer allowed 2 employees to ride the steps of a refuse collection truck for more than 0.2 miles. The truck is a 2006 International cab and frame with a Pakmor dump body. This is not compliant with ANSI Z245.1-1999 and the NIOSH Alert for Preventing Worker Injuries and Deaths from Moving Refuse Collection Vehicles. A feasible and acceptable abatement method, among others, would be for the employer to develop and enforce a policy that prohibits employees from riding the steps for a distance greater than 0.2 miles. Employees can ride either in the cab of the refuse vehicle or in a follow vehicle. c) Montgomery Vill DPW - The employer had not provided training and education for employees who operate and work around refuse collection equipment, as required by ANSI Z245.1-1999, and the manufacturer's operating manuals. The lack of training and hazard awareness related to refuse collection equipment can result in falls and crushing injuries. A feasible abatement method, among others, would be for the employer to provide a training and education program for employees prior to assignment. It would be beneficial to routinely reinforce the training by tailgate training sessions, so that employees are familiar with the safety hazards and safe work practices related to refuse collection equipment. d) Montgomery Vill DPW - The employer had not provided a safety and health program to ensure employees are operating the equipment properly as required by ANSI Z245.1-1999 and the manufacturer are operating manuals. A feasible abatement method, among others, wouldbe for the employer to provide procedures for ensuring that employees are practicing safe work practices and for employer monitoring of equipment use.
1910.106 D02 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2008
1910.212 B
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2008
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2008
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2008
1910.253 B02 II
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2008
1910.253 B04 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2008
1910.303 F
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2008
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2008
1910.304 E01 IV
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2008
1910.304 F04
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2008
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2008
1910.305 G01 III
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2008
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2008
1910.334 A02 II
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2008
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2008
1910.22 D01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2008
1910.120 L01 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2008
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2008
1910.132 F04
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2008
More inspections at Montgomery Vill DPW
View Montgomery Vill DPW's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237310)
Jul 17, 2026
NEW Enterprise Stone & Lime CO., INC. · WILKES BARRE, PA
Jul 16, 2026
317744799 - North Santiam Paving CO · CORVALLIS, OR
Jul 16, 2026
Groveland TN Highway Dept · GROVELAND, NY
Jul 16, 2026
Borough of Pennington Department of Public Works · PENNINGTON, NJ
Jul 16, 2026
DE Silva Gates Construction · RANCHO CORDOVA, CA
More inspections in NY
Jul 17, 2026
Sullivan County Care Center at Sunset Lake · LIBERTY, NY
Jul 17, 2026
Vergara Electrical LLC · NEW YORK, NY
Jul 17, 2026
Apple Converting, INC. · ONEONTA, NY
Jul 17, 2026
Namicela Home Solutions INC · SYRACUSE, NY
Jul 17, 2026
Cranesville Block CO., INC. · SYRACUSE, NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 306983925.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.