STINNETT, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: D-J'S WELL SERVICE AND ROUSTABOUT INC
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of D-J'S WELL SERVICE AND ROUSTABOUT INC in RILEY G LEASE, 10 M NW STINNETT, STINNETT, TX 79083 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 307008433.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- D-J'S WELL SERVICE AND ROUSTABOUT INC
- Site address
- RILEY G LEASE, 10 M NW STINNETT
- City
- STINNETT
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79083
- Mailing
- PO BOX 1130, BORGER, TX 79008
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- Yes
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 213112
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1389
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the condition(s) listed below: a) On June 21, 2005, employees of D-J's Well Service took a Cabot T-base pumping unit loose from its base and placed it onto shoring timbers, without attaching it firmly to anything else. Before doing this, they chained the bull gear to prevent the counterweights from traveling, after attaching one counterweight to a truck-mounted pole hoist. When they released the chain by hoisting the counterweights, one employee was pushing on the drive belts to prevent the counterweights from moving, which placed him in their zone of travel. When he released the belts, the swinging counterweights were suspended from only one side, which had the effect of overbalancing the unit and causing it to topple over. Employees were thus exposed to the recognized hazards of being caught underneath falling equipment and being struck by or caught between the swinging counterweights and the rest of the pumping unit. Exposure to these hazards could have been avoided by: 1. Attaching both counterweights to the hoist with a sling, which would have permitted better control of the counterweights and avoided the need to have anyone holding their drive belts to restrain them. 2. Proper maintenance of the brake system on the pumping unit, which would have helped prevent unintended movement of the counterweights. 3. Attaching the pumping unit to a steel skid base or concrete pad, which would have significantly reduced the likelihood of it tipping over. 4. Chaining the beam to a frame member instead of a moving assembly, so that the chain would have been easier to detach.
Recent events (2)
- · J (S) $3500.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 213112)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 307008433.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.