Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: D-J'S WELL SERVICE AND ROUSTABOUT INC

Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of D-J'S WELL SERVICE AND ROUSTABOUT INC in RILEY G LEASE, 10 M NW STINNETT, STINNETT, TX 79083 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 307008433.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch D-J'S Well Service and Roustabout INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for D-J'S Well Service and Roustabout INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
RILEY G LEASE, 10 M NW STINNETT
City
STINNETT
State
TX
ZIP
79083
Mailing
PO BOX 1130, BORGER, TX 79008
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
Yes
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213112
SIC code (legacy)
1389
Employees
50
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2005
Abate by
Sep 19, 2005
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to the condition(s) listed below:
a) On June 21, 2005, employees of D-J's Well Service took a Cabot T-base
pumping unit loose
from its base and placed it onto shoring timbers, without attaching it
firmly to anything else.
Before doing this, they chained the bull gear to prevent the
counterweights from traveling, after
attaching one counterweight to a truck-mounted pole hoist. When they
released the chain by
hoisting the counterweights, one employee was pushing on the drive belts
to prevent the
counterweights from moving, which placed him in their zone of travel. When
he released the
belts, the swinging counterweights were suspended from only one side,
which had the effect of
overbalancing the unit and causing it to topple over. Employees were thus
exposed
to the
recognized hazards of being caught underneath falling equipment and being
struck by or caught
between the swinging counterweights and the rest of the pumping unit.
Exposure to these hazards could have been avoided by:
1. Attaching both counterweights to the hoist with a sling, which would
have permitted better
control of the counterweights and avoided the need to have anyone holding
their drive belts to
restrain them.
2. Proper maintenance of the brake system on the pumping unit, which would
have helped
prevent unintended movement of the counterweights.
3. Attaching the pumping unit to a steel skid base or concrete pad, which
would have
significantly reduced the likelihood of it tipping over.
4. Chaining the beam to a frame member instead of a moving assembly, so
that the chain would
have been easier to detach.
Recent events (2)
  • · J (S) $3500.00
  • · Z (S) $3500.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 307008433.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.