LAUREL, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: THE TREE ADVOCATE, INC
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of THE TREE ADVOCATE, INC in 1014 SORRENTO WOODS BLVD., LAUREL, FL 34272 (NAICS 561730). OSHA activity number 307150854.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE TREE ADVOCATE, INC
- Site address
- 1014 SORRENTO WOODS BLVD.
- City
- LAUREL
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 34272
- Mailing
- 1124 MYRTLE AVE., VENICE, FL 34292
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561730
- SIC code (legacy)
- 0783
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 10, 2004
- Abate by
- May 20, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were expose to a struck-by hazard while cutting down a tree. On or about 12/04/2003, the employer had not ensured that: 1) the chain saw operator (using the short saw) was trained in the operational procedures of cutting down a tree; 2) the employee (Foreman) entering back into the "work area" got approval from the chain saw operator; 3) the Foreman developed and followed a work plan; and, 4) employees in the work area were looking at the tree/stump until it fell. One feasible and acceptable abatement method, among others, to correct this hazard is to implement a "work plan" identifying the signals for safe or unsafe conditions, ensure that employees never enter a fall zone/work area unless the operator is aware of it and acknowledges the employee, and ensure that all the employee(s) in the "work area" have constant visual contact with the tree/stump. [Reference American National Standards Institute, ANSI Z133.1, "Pruning, Repairing, Maintaining, and Removing Trees, and Cutting Brush - Safety Requirements, Section 9.5 - Tree Removal.]nts,
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4000.00
- · Z (S) $4900.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561730)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 307150854.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.