Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: THE TREE ADVOCATE, INC

Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of THE TREE ADVOCATE, INC in 1014 SORRENTO WOODS BLVD., LAUREL, FL 34272 (NAICS 561730). OSHA activity number 307150854.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch The Tree Advocate, INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for The Tree Advocate, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1014 SORRENTO WOODS BLVD.
City
LAUREL
State
FL
ZIP
34272
Mailing
1124 MYRTLE AVE., VENICE, FL 34292
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561730
SIC code (legacy)
0783
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2004
Abate by
May 20, 2004
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,000 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1)  of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized
hazards that were causing or likely
to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees
were expose to a struck-by hazard
while cutting down a tree.  On or about 12/04/2003, the employer had not
ensured that: 1) the chain saw
operator (using the short saw) was trained in the operational procedures
of cutting down a tree; 2) the
employee (Foreman) entering back into the "work area" got approval from
the chain saw operator; 3) the
Foreman developed and followed a work plan; and, 4) employees in the work
area were looking at the
tree/stump until it fell.
One feasible and acceptable abatement method, among others, to correct
this hazard is to implement a
"work plan" identifying the signals for safe or unsafe conditions, ensure
that employees never enter a
fall zone/work area unless the operator is aware of it and acknowledges
the employee, and ensure that
all the employee(s) in the "work area" have constant visual contact with
the
tree/stump. [Reference
American National Standards Institute, ANSI Z133.1, "Pruning, Repairing,
Maintaining, and
Removing Trees, and Cutting Brush - Safety Requirements, Section 9.5 -
Tree Removal.]nts,
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4000.00
  • · Z (S) $4900.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 307150854.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.