WINSTON SALEM, NC —
OSHA Inspection: COMPLETE ELECTRIC CO. INC. OF CHARLOTTE
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of COMPLETE ELECTRIC CO. INC. OF CHARLOTTE in E. HANES MILL BLVD., WINSTON SALEM, NC 27102 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 307446807.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COMPLETE ELECTRIC CO. INC. OF CHARLOTTE
- Site address
- E. HANES MILL BLVD.
- City
- WINSTON SALEM
- State
- NC
- ZIP
- 27102
- Mailing
- 620 SIMPSON ROAD, INDIAN TRAIL, NC 28079
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238210
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1731
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Construction safety.
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
95012901
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $250 · Current $250
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a)12 foot in height falls to the dirt/debris below working from a platform attached to a Sunbelt, model#SS-644C, ID#S91070, located at E. Hanes Mill Blvd., Winston Salem, NC, the employer did not ensure that employees used their personal fall protection or a fall arrest system to ensure that employees would not be exposed to fall hazards. or in the alternative: 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Employees on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was six feet or more above a lower level were not protected from falling by the use of a guardrail system, safety net system or personal fall arrest system. a)jobsite, west side of building - employees were working from a platform attached to a Sunbelt, model#SS-644C, ID#S91070, exposing themselves to 12 foot in height falls to the dirt/debris below without any personal fall protection or fall arrest system. One feasible and acceptable abatement method(s) to correct this hazard would include ensuring that employees use their personal protective equipment provided or a fall arrest system.d
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2004
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238210)
More inspections in NC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 307446807.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.