VACHERIE, LA ·
OSHA Inspection: GROSSE TETE WELL SERVICE
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GROSSE TETE WELL SERVICE in LOWER VACHERIE FIELD, SMITH PRODUCTION WELL #6, VACHERIE, LA 70090 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 307593269.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GROSSE TETE WELL SERVICE
- Site address
- LOWER VACHERIE FIELD, SMITH PRODUCTION WELL #6
- City
- VACHERIE
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 70090
- Mailing
- PO BOX 422, GROSSE TETE, LA 70740
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 213112
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1389
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
17 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 28, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $225 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of: For the period of time up to and including 02 Apr 04, the employer did not always assure that the rig was rigged up in a safe manner prior to the commencement of well operations. Well servicing operations had begun without the proper number if guywires attached and secured to anchors. This condition allowed for the two (2) guywires that were installed to be pulled from the ground, becoming de-tensioned, which allowed for the derrick to move noticeably when tripping in/out of the hole. This condition exposed employees to the hazards associated with the potential collapse/failure of the derrick. American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice RP54 Paragraph 6.3.2 states that "Well operations involving the rig shall not be commenced until the rig is rigged up in a safe manner." Among other means, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard would be to install the correct number of guywires in accordance with the manufacturers recommendations or install guywires in accordance with the minimum requirements as set forth in American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice API RP 4G Second Edition dated Oct 1998 Paragraphs 6.1-8 and Appendix A Fig A-1.6.ix
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $225.00
- · Z (S) $375.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 28, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $225 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of: For the period of time up to and including 02 Apr 04, the employer did not always ensure that ground anchors had been pull tested prior to the commencement of work. Well servicing operations had begun without the anchors' capacity being determined. Movement of the anchors in the ground from their original position was apparent, which allowed the derrick to visibly move while tripping in/out of the hole. This condition exposed employee's of the employer and other contractors working on site to the hazards associated to the tipping over and/or collapse of the derrick. American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice RP54 Paragraph 6.3.2 states that: "Well Operations involving the rig shall not be commenced until the rig is rigged up in a safe manner." Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard would be to: verify the capacity of each anchor within 24 months prior to commencing work in accordance with the requirements as set forth in American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice API RP 4G, Second Edition dated Oct 1998 Paragraphs 7.1 thru 7.8.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $225.00
- · Z (S) $375.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 28, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 10, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $225 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of: For the period of time up to and including 02 Apr 04, the employer did not always install the adequate number of clips on .500-.625 inch wire rope used for guy wires from the derrick, and the clips were not properly attached. This condition exposed employees and other contractor employees on site to the hazards and injuries related to the wire rope coming free of the clips and becoming a "whip" when under tension. One feasible and acceptable means to correct this hazard would be to assure that the adequate number of wire rope clips are installed at the end of wire ropes in accordance with API RP 9B, Paragraph 3.7.4.aph
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $225.00
- · Z (S) $375.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 28, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $225 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of: For the period of time up to and including 02 Apr 04, the employer did not always ensure that the Derrick Emergency Escape Device or "Geronimo" was installed and ready for employee use should the need arise. This condition exposed employees working above the wellhead to the hazards associated with fire. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to ensure that the Escape Device installed each time the rig is rigged up.ged
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $225.00
- · Z (S) $375.00
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- May 28, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $225 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $225.00
- · Z (S) $375.00
1910.24 B
- Issued
- May 28, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $225 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $225.00
- · Z (S) $375.00
1910.27 D03
- Issued
- May 28, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2004
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.36 B01
- Issued
- May 28, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $225 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $135.00
- · Z (S) $225.00
1910.132 C
- Issued
- May 28, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $315 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $315.00
- · Z (S) $525.00
1910.145 C02 I
- Issued
- May 28, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $225 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $135.00
- · Z (S) $225.00
1910.145 C03
- Issued
- May 28, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2004
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.151 B
- Issued
- May 28, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $225 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $135.00
- · Z (S) $225.00
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- May 28, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $225 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $135.00
- · Z (S) $225.00
1910.157 D01
- Issued
- May 28, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2004
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 28, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 24, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $225 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $135.00
- · Z (S) $225.00
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- May 28, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 10, 2004
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.141 C01 I
- Issued
- May 28, 2004
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $150 · Current $90 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $90.00
- · Z (O) $150.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 213112)
More inspections in LA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 307593269.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.