Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: GROSSE TETE WELL SERVICE

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GROSSE TETE WELL SERVICE in LOWER VACHERIE FIELD, SMITH PRODUCTION WELL #6, VACHERIE, LA 70090 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 307593269.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Grosse Tete Well Service for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Grosse Tete Well Service is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
LOWER VACHERIE FIELD, SMITH PRODUCTION WELL #6
City
VACHERIE
State
LA
ZIP
70090
Mailing
PO BOX 422, GROSSE TETE, LA 70740
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213112
SIC code (legacy)
1389
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

17 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2004
Abate by
Jun 7, 2004
Penalty
Initial $375 · Current $225 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that
employees were exposed to the hazard of:
For the period of time up to and including 02 Apr 04, the employer did not
always assure that
the rig was rigged up in a safe manner prior to the commencement of well
operations. Well
servicing operations had begun without the proper number if guywires
attached and secured to
anchors. This condition allowed for the two (2) guywires that were
installed to be pulled from
the ground, becoming de-tensioned, which allowed for the derrick to move
noticeably when
tripping in/out of the hole. This condition exposed employees to the
hazards associated with the
potential collapse/failure of the derrick.
American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice RP54 Paragraph 6.3.2
states that "Well
operations involving the rig shall not be commenced until the rig is
rigged up in a safe manner."
Among other means, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this
hazard would be
to install the correct number of guywires in accordance with the
manufacturers
recommendations or install guywires in accordance with the minimum
requirements as
set forth in American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice API RP 4G
Second
Edition dated Oct 1998 Paragraphs 6.1-8 and Appendix A Fig A-1.6.ix
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $225.00
  • · Z (S) $375.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2004
Abate by
Jun 7, 2004
Penalty
Initial $375 · Current $225 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that
employees were exposed to the hazard of:
For the period of time up to and including 02 Apr 04, the employer did not
always
ensure that
ground anchors had been pull tested prior to the commencement of work.
Well servicing
operations had begun without the anchors' capacity being determined.
Movement of the anchors
in the ground from their original position was apparent, which allowed the
derrick to visibly
move while tripping in/out of the hole. This condition exposed employee's
of the employer and
other contractors working on site to the hazards associated to the tipping
over and/or collapse
of the derrick.
American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice RP54 Paragraph 6.3.2
states that: "Well
Operations involving the rig  shall not  be commenced until the rig is
rigged up in a safe
manner."
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard
would be to: verify the capacity of each anchor within 24 months prior to
commencing work in
accordance with the requirements as set forth in American Petroleum
Institute Recommended
Practice API RP 4G, Second Edition dated Oct 1998 Paragraphs 7.1 thru 7.8.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $225.00
  • · Z (S) $375.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2004
Abate by
Jun 10, 2004
Penalty
Initial $375 · Current $225 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that
employees were exposed to the hazard of:
For the period of time up to and including 02 Apr 04, the employer did not
always install the
adequate number of clips on .500-.625 inch wire rope used for guy wires
from the derrick, and
the clips were not properly attached. This condition exposed employees and
other contractor
employees on site to the hazards and injuries related to the wire rope
coming free of the clips
and becoming a "whip" when under tension.
One feasible and acceptable means to correct this hazard would be to
assure that the adequate
number of wire rope clips are installed at the end of wire ropes in
accordance
with API RP 9B,
Paragraph 3.7.4.aph
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $225.00
  • · Z (S) $375.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2004
Abate by
Jun 7, 2004
Penalty
Initial $375 · Current $225 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that
employees were exposed to the hazard of:
For the period of time up to and including 02 Apr 04, the employer did not
always ensure that
the Derrick Emergency Escape Device or "Geronimo" was installed and ready
for employee use
should the need arise. This condition exposed employees working above the
wellhead to the
hazards associated with fire.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is
to ensure that the Escape Device installed each time the rig is rigged
up.ged
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $225.00
  • · Z (S) $375.00

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 03 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2004
Abate by
Jun 7, 2004
Penalty
Initial $375 · Current $225 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $225.00
  • · Z (S) $375.00

1910.24 B

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2004
Abate by
Jun 7, 2004
Penalty
Initial $375 · Current $225 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $225.00
  • · Z (S) $375.00

1910.27 D03

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2004
Abate by
Jun 7, 2004
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.36 B01

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2004
Abate by
Jun 7, 2004
Penalty
Initial $225 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $135.00
  • · Z (S) $225.00

1910.132 C

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2004
Abate by
Jun 7, 2004
Penalty
Initial $525 · Current $315 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $315.00
  • · Z (S) $525.00

1910.145 C02 I

Serious Gravity 01 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2004
Abate by
Jun 7, 2004
Penalty
Initial $225 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $135.00
  • · Z (S) $225.00

1910.145 C03

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2004
Abate by
Jun 7, 2004
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.151 B

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2004
Abate by
Jun 7, 2004
Penalty
Initial $225 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $135.00
  • · Z (S) $225.00

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2004
Abate by
Jun 7, 2004
Penalty
Initial $225 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $135.00
  • · Z (S) $225.00

1910.157 D01

Serious Gravity 01 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2004
Abate by
Jun 7, 2004
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2004
Abate by
Jun 24, 2004
Penalty
Initial $225 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $135.00
  • · Z (S) $225.00

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2004
Abate by
Jun 10, 2004
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.141 C01 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 03 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2004
Abate by
Jun 7, 2004
Penalty
Initial $150 · Current $90 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $90.00
  • · Z (O) $150.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 307593269.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.