LITTLETON, CO ·
OSHA Inspection: CARDER CONCRETE
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CARDER CONCRETE in 8311 W. CARDER CT., LITTLETON, CO 80125 (NAICS 327332). OSHA activity number 307648188.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CARDER CONCRETE
- Site address
- 8311 W. CARDER CT.
- City
- LITTLETON
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80125
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327332
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3272
- Employees
- 116
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
27 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $1,100 · Current $440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the possibility of dropped loads resulting in crushing hazards: (a) On or about May 20, 2004 and at times prior, employees were exposed to potential crushing injury from loss of load, while using the P & H 5 ton hoist located in the South Plant, which was not inspected to ensure the critical components were in good operational order. (b) On or about May 20, 2004 and at time prior, employees were exposed to potential crushing injury from loss of load, while using the Shawbox, 1 ton hoist located in the South Plant, which was not inspected to ensure the critical components were in good operational order. ABATEMENT NOTE: Among other methods, one feasible acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to: (a) Perform frequent inspections at daily to monthly intervals as per ANSI B-30- 16-1.2.1.2 and 2.2.1.2 on items such as: 1.All controls and operating mechanisms for improper operation; daily. 2.All safety devices for malfunction; daily. 3.Deterioration or leakage in air systems, if applicable. 4.Hooks for deformations, chemical damage, or cracks.Other load-bearing components of the hoist; daily. 5.Load-carrying ropes.Visual inspection daily for wear, twist, distortion or improper dead-ending to the hoisting drum and other attachments. Check chain also for deposits of foreign material which may be carried into the hoist mechanism. (b) Perform periodic inspections at monthly to yearly intervals as per ANSI B30.16 2.2.1.3, which includes the requirements specified above plus: 1.Loose bolts or rivets. 2.Cracked or worn drums or sheaves. 3.Worn, corroded, cracked or distorted parts such as pins, bearings, shafts, gears, rollers, locking and clamping devices. 4.Excessive wear on motor or load brake. 5.Excessive wear of chain, rope, load sprockets, drums, sheaves, and chain stretch. 6 Hooks. Dye penetrants, magnetic particle or other suitable crack detecting inspections should be performed at least once per year. 7.Electrical apparatus for signs of pitting or any deterioration of controller contractors, limit switches and push button stations. 8.Hook retaining nuts or collars and pins, welds or riveting used to secure the retaining members should be inspected.9.Supporting structure and trolley if used shall be inspected, for continued ability to support the imposed loads. 10.Warning label for absence or illegibility. (c) Written, dated and signed inspection reports and records should be made monthly on critical items such as brakes, hooks, chains and ropes. Records should be readily available. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation is required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter").
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $440.00
- · Z (S) $1100.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees are exposed to potential failure of the personal fall arrest systems from an anchorage which was not certified. (a) On or about May 20, 2004 and at times prior, employees were exposed to a fall hazard in excess of nine feet to the ground below in that the anchorage point for the fall protection system had not been certified for 5000 pounds of force. In the Cast Plant an employee had been using the concrete discharge bucket as an anchorage point. The employees were connected to the bottom of the concrete discharge pipe while filling concrete forms. (b) On or about May 20, 2004 and at time prior, employees were exposed to a fall hazard in excess of nine feet to the ground below in that the anchorage point for the fall protection system had not been certified for 5000 pounds of force or a safety factor of 4:1. In the South Plant two employees had been using the fixed ladder as an anchorage point. The employees while connected to the fixed metal ladder, were required to climb onto the concrete forms and finish the concrete as the forms moved to the next stage of production. ABATEMENT NOTE: Among other methods, one feasible acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to: (a) Follow the requirements listed in ANSI Z359.1-1992 (R1999) Safety Requirements for Personal Fall Arrest Systems. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation is required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter").-Certification
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $1,925 · Current $770 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the possibility of dropped loads resulting in crushing hazards: (a) On or about May 20, 2004 and at times prior, employees were exposed to crushing injury in the Maintenance Shop while using the job built hoist which was not certified, and did not have a rated load capacity. The job made mobile hoist stand was not certified by a professional engineer as to the stability and capability of the mobile hoisting stand. A rated capacity was not listed for the steel components that held the hoist. Reference American National Standards Institute, ANSI B30.16-1987 Overhead Hoist (under hung), Section 16-1.3.2 Support: "The supporting structure, including trolley, monorail, or crane, shall be designed to withstand the loads and forces imposed by the hoist for the rated load." Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct hishazard is to: (a) Have the hoisting stand certified by a registered professional engineer. (b) Utilize a proper lifting device such as, but not limited to, a forklift or overhead traveling hoist. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter").-Certification
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $770.00
- · Z (S) $1925.00
1910.22 C
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $825 · Current $330 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $330.00
- · Z (S) $825.00
1910.23 A02
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $825 · Current $330 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $330.00
- · Z (S) $825.00
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2004
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.146 C01
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $1,375 · Current $550 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $550.00
- · Z (S) $1375.00
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.176 B
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $825 · Current $330 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $330.00
- · Z (S) $825.00
1910.179 I
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $1,925 · Current $1,925
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1925.00
- · Z (S) $1925.00
1910.179 J02 IV
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.184 E03 I
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $1,100 · Current $440 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $440.00
- · Z (S) $1100.00
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $1,925 · Current $770 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $770.00
- · Z (S) $1925.00
1910.213 D01
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $1,100 · Current $440 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $440.00
- · Z (S) $1100.00
1910.215 A01
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $825 · Current $330 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $330.00
- · Z (S) $825.00
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $825 · Current $330 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $330.00
- · Z (S) $825.00
1910.252 B02
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $825 · Current $330 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $330.00
- · Z (S) $825.00
1910.27 C04
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $550 · Current $220 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $220.00
- · Z (O) $550.00
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.141 D02 II
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.212 A05
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2004
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.243 B02
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.303 G01
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2004
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.146 C02
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2004
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
More inspections at Carder Concrete
View Carder Concrete's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327332)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 307648188.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.