Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION in MAINTENANCE - HENDERSON, HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28791 (NAICS 926120). OSHA activity number 307844902.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch N.C. Department of Transportation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for N.C. Department of Transportation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
MAINTENANCE - HENDERSON
City
HENDERSONVILLE
State
NC
ZIP
28791
Mailing
MR. HERB OXENDINE, CSP, SYLVA, NC 28779
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
926120
SIC code (legacy)
9621
Employees
58
Ownership type
C
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

7 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Deleted Serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2004
Abate by
Aug 2, 2004
Penalty
Initial $813
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North
Carolina:  The employer did not furnish each of his employees conditions
of employment and a
place of employment free from recognized hazards that were causing or
likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
a)  facility  --  the 2-ton Dayton crane at the salt spreader hangers had
not been load
tested.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct
this hazard is to have the crane load tested.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S)
  • — Z (S) $813.00

95012901

Deleted Serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2004
Abate by
Jun 25, 2004
Penalty
Initial $813
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North
Carolina:  The employer did not furnish employment and a place of
employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical
harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
a)  the pendant control on the Dayton 2-ton crane in the salt spreader
hanger area was
not
supported.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S)
  • — Z (S) $813.00

95012901

Deleted Serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2004
Abate by
Aug 2, 2004
Penalty
Initial $813
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North
Carolina:  The employer did not furnish employment and a place of
employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical
harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
a)  facility  --  monthly inspections of the hook on the Dayton 2-ton
crane in the salt
spreader
hanger area were not being performed.s
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S)
  • — Z (S) $813.00

95012901

Deleted Serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2004
Abate by
Aug 2, 2004
Penalty
Initial $813
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North
Carolina:  The employer did not furnish employment and a place of
employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical
harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
a)  facility  --  monthly inspections of the chains on the Dayton 2-ton
crane in the salt
spreader
hanger area were not being performed.s
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S)
  • — Z (S) $813.00

95012901

Deleted Serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2004
Abate by
Aug 2, 2004
Penalty
Initial $813
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North
Carolina:  The employer did not furnish employment and a place of
employment
which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical
harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
a)  facility  --  the Dayton 2-ton crane in the salt spreader hanger area
had never been
completely
inspected.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S)
  • — Z (S) $813.00

1910.23 C01

Deleted Serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2004
Abate by
Aug 2, 2004
Penalty
Initial $813
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S)
  • — Z (S) $813.00

1910.22 D01

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2004
Abate by
Aug 2, 2004
Recent events (2)
  • — F (O)
  • — Z (O)

View N.C. Department of Transportation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 307844902.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.