SPRINGFIELD, OH —
OSHA Inspection: TEIKURO CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TEIKURO CORPORATION in 4500 GATEWAY BLVD, SPRINGFIELD, OH 44502 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 307845131.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TEIKURO CORPORATION
- Site address
- 4500 GATEWAY BLVD
- City
- SPRINGFIELD
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44502
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332813
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3471
- Employees
- 81
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2004
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to being struck by falling loads or lifting devices due to the potential failure of the components on the below the hook attachments known as spider jibs and platforms due to failure to document the testing and rated load of each piece: (a)The small, medium, large and extra large below the hook devices known as the spider jibs, used to move dies did not have both the top and bottom marked with the rated load markings on the pieces. There was no identification that showed the manufacturer's name and address, the serial number for each piece, each lifter weight and the rated load for the individual parts as well as the overall device. (b)The modifications of adding a platform and guardrails onto the top portions of the medium, large and extra large below the hook lifting devices were not tested by a designated person to confirm the load rating of the lifters following the modifications. (c)The below the hook attachments, the platforms located in the degreasing area used to lift dies during the cleaning process were not adequately marked with the rated load markings on each piece. There was no identification that showed the name of the manufacturer's and the serial number for each piece, and the weight of the platform. The platforms had a 400 pound marking etched into the steel. Amongst feasible and acceptable abatement is to ensure that the rated load marking with a minimum design safety factor of 3 as well as a permanent marking identifying the manufacturer's name and address, serial number, lifter weight when over 100 pounds are displayed on the main structure of the below the hook lifting device in accordance with ANSI/ASME B30.20-2003 "Below The Hook Lifting Devices."03
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1450.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2004
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees in the Degreaser area were exposed to fall hazards, while in a platform suspended from a crane or underhung hoist, due to failure of the hoist mechanism, load line, platform, or platform suspension means: (a)The platforms located in the Degreaser area designed for lifting dies in and out tanks using overhead underhung cranes or hoists, were also being used as a personnel lifting system for employees to access and exit tanks in the small parts area when performing cleaning and/or maintenance inside of the tanks, despite the availability of other access means. The platforms did not have a designed safety factor based on being a personnel lifting platform, nor did the platforms have standard guardrails around the platform or adequate anchorage points within the platform or on the boom tip of the cranes being utilized for employees utilizing fall protection to tie off to during suspension of the platforms. A feasible and acceptable abatement would be to utilize properly positioned and secured portable ladder access into the tanks and ensure that the use of personnel lifting platform in conjunction with overhead underhung cranes or hoists be limited to circumstances where other access means are not feasible (in accordance with ANSI/ASME B30.16 -1993), and only then be performed in accordance with ANSI/ASME B30.23-1998 for Personnel Lifting Systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $750
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S) $750.00
1910.37 B05
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $525
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S) $525.00
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2004
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $200.00
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.147 C05 I
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $200.00
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $200.00
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.179 M03IIIV
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2004
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2004
- Abate by
- Aug 17, 2004
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
More inspections at Teikuro Corporation
View Teikuro Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332813)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 307845131.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.