Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TEIKURO CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TEIKURO CORPORATION in 4500 GATEWAY BLVD, SPRINGFIELD, OH 44502 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 307845131.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Teikuro Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Teikuro Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TEIKURO CORPORATION
Site address
4500 GATEWAY BLVD
City
SPRINGFIELD
State
OH
ZIP
44502
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
SIC code (legacy)
3471
Employees
81
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

11 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2004
Abate by
Sep 22, 2004
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $1,450 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to being struck by falling loads or lifting devices due to
the potential failure of the
components on the below the hook attachments known as spider jibs and
platforms due to failure
to document the testing and rated load of each piece:
(a)The small, medium, large and extra large below the hook devices known
as the spider
jibs, used to move dies did not have both the top and bottom marked with
the rated load
markings on the pieces.  There was no identification that showed the
manufacturer's name and
address, the serial number for each piece, each lifter weight and the
rated load for the individual
parts as well as the overall device.
(b)The modifications of adding a platform and guardrails onto the top
portions
of the
medium, large and extra large below the hook lifting devices were not
tested by a designated
person to confirm the load rating of the lifters following the
modifications.
(c)The below the hook attachments, the platforms located in the degreasing
area used to lift
dies during the cleaning process were not adequately marked with the rated
load markings on
each piece.  There was no identification that showed the name of the
manufacturer's and the
serial number for each piece, and the weight of the platform.  The
platforms had a 400 pound
marking etched into the steel.
Amongst feasible and acceptable abatement is to ensure that the rated load
marking with a
minimum design safety factor of 3 as well as a permanent marking
identifying the
manufacturer's name and address, serial number, lifter weight when over
100 pounds are
displayed on the main structure of the below the hook lifting device in
accordance with
ANSI/ASME B30.20-2003 "Below The Hook Lifting Devices."03
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1450.00
  • — Z (S) $2500.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2004
Abate by
Sep 22, 2004
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $1,500 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
in the Degreaser area  were exposed to fall hazards, while in a platform
suspended from a crane
or underhung hoist, due to failure of the hoist mechanism, load line,
platform, or platform
suspension means:
(a)The platforms located in the Degreaser area designed for lifting dies
in and out tanks
using overhead underhung cranes or hoists, were also being used as a
personnel lifting system
for employees to access and exit tanks in the small parts area when
performing cleaning and/or
maintenance inside of the tanks, despite the availability of other access
means. The platforms
did not have a designed safety factor based on being a personnel lifting
platform,
nor did the
platforms have standard guardrails around the platform or adequate
anchorage points within the
platform or on the boom tip of the cranes being utilized for employees
utilizing fall protection
to tie off to during suspension of the platforms.
A feasible and acceptable abatement would be to utilize properly
positioned and secured portable
ladder access into the tanks and ensure that the use of personnel lifting
platform in conjunction
with overhead underhung cranes or hoists be limited to circumstances where
other access means
are not feasible (in accordance with ANSI/ASME B30.16 -1993), and only
then be performed
in accordance with ANSI/ASME B30.23-1998 for Personnel Lifting Systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500.00
  • — Z (S) $2500.00

1910.37 B02

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 4 instances 95 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2004
Abate by
Aug 10, 2004
Penalty
Initial $750
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (S) $750.00

1910.37 B05

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 8 instances 95 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2004
Abate by
Aug 10, 2004
Penalty
Initial $525
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (S) $525.00

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2004
Abate by
Aug 24, 2004
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $500.00
  • — Z (S) $2500.00

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2004
Abate by
Sep 22, 2004
Penalty
Initial $875 · Current $200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $200.00
  • — Z (S) $875.00

1910.147 C05 I

Serious Gravity 03 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2004
Abate by
Aug 31, 2004
Penalty
Initial $875 · Current $200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $200.00
  • — Z (S) $875.00

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 03 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2004
Abate by
Aug 31, 2004
Penalty
Initial $875 · Current $200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $200.00
  • — Z (S) $875.00

1910.147 D04 I

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2004
Abate by
Aug 31, 2004
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900.00
  • — Z (S) $2500.00

1910.179 M03IIIV

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2004
Abate by
Sep 22, 2004
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $250.00
  • — Z (S) $2500.00

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2004
Abate by
Aug 17, 2004
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $500.00
  • — Z (S) $2500.00

View Teikuro Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 307845131.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.