Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: H.E.BUTT GROCERY (MILK PLANT)

Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of H.E.BUTT GROCERY (MILK PLANT) in 4710 N. PAN AM EXPRESSWAY, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78218 (NAICS 445110). OSHA activity number 307955500.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch H.E.Butt Grocery (Milk Plant) — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for H.E.Butt Grocery (Milk Plant) is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4710 N. PAN AM EXPRESSWAY
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78218
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
445110
SIC code (legacy)
5141
Employees
50
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2006
Abate by
Jan 23, 2006
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to a caught between hazard:
a)  On or about 09/25/05 an employee entered the work zone of an Automatic
Fork
Truck/ Crane and was fatally pinned between this equipment and a column.
The employer failed
to ensure that this equipment did not automatically perform/start an
operation while an employee
is in the work zone.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this
hazard is to interlock the access to the AFT/ Cranes work zone.
Interlocking the access to the
work zone would prevent automatic movement/ start-up of the AFT/ Crane
while an employee
in accessing the AFT/ Cranes work zone.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500.00
  • — Z (S) $2500.00

1910.132 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 02 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2006
Abate by
Jan 23, 2006
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000.00
  • — Z (S) $2000.00

1910.178 L06

Deleted Serious Gravity 01 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2006
Abate by
Jan 23, 2006
Penalty
Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1910.303 F

Other-than-serious Gravity 02 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2006
Abate by
Jan 23, 2006
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1000.00
  • — Z (S) $2000.00

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 02 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2006
Abate by
Jan 23, 2006
Penalty
Current $2,000
Recent events (3)
  • — Q $2000.00
  • — I (S) $2000.00
  • — Z (S) $2000.00

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 01 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2006
Abate by
Jan 23, 2006
Recent events (3)
  • — Q $1500.00
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 307955500.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.