CLAREMORE, OK ·
OSHA Inspection: VALMONT COATINGS-OKLAHOMA GALVANIZING
Accident-driven inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven health inspection of VALMONT COATINGS-OKLAHOMA GALVANIZING in 25055 ALLIANCE DR., CLAREMORE, OK 74019 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 308059088.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VALMONT COATINGS-OKLAHOMA GALVANIZING
- Site address
- 25055 ALLIANCE DR.
- City
- CLAREMORE
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 74019
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332812
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3479
- Employees
- 100
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2005
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer does not ensure employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees. Employees were exposed to the hazard of chemical burns from concentrated sulfuric acid and the hazard of being struck-by debris caused by the leakage and/or rupture failure of a storage tank operating under pressure: The employer pressurizes storage tanks which are not designed to be pressure vessels. This violation most recently occurred on or about August 30, 2004 and times prior thereto, when the Plant 1 Sulfuric Acid Storage Tank was pressurized at over 15 psig. The storage tank was not designed and built as a pressure vessel. Sulfuric acid was transferred from the storage tank to the dip tanks by pressurizing the storage tank with compressed plant air. Feasible methods to protect employees may include, but are not limited to, the following: 1.Store sulfuric acid in an atmospheric or non-pressurized system. 2.Transfer sulfuric acid from storage tank to dip tanks using gravity flow. If gravity flow cannot be utilized, transfer sulfuric acid from storage tank to dip tanks utilizing a pump specifically recommended for sulfuric acid service. ***Pursuant to 1903.19, the employer must submit an abatement plan within 30 days describing the steps it is taking to ensure compliance, and its schedule for completing these actions. The abatement plan must include a description of how these steps protect employees from the hazard of chemical burns and/or struck-by debris caused by the leakage and/or rupture failure of a sulfuric acid storage tank; the plan must describe industry recommended practices, experts consulted, etc., during the creation of the abatement plan. The abatement plan must describe future steps the employer will take to ensure the integrity and safety of the sulfuric acid storage tank, such as, but not limited to, maintenance and operating procedures developed to ensure continued protection of employees from the hazards caused by the leakage and/or rupture failure of a sulfuric acid storage tank. Progress reports must be submitted every 30 days describing steps that have been achieved, whether it is meeting the schedule set forth in its abatement plan, and if not why not.***nt
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $4200.00
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.120 Q01
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2005
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $4200.00
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.120 Q03 I
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2005
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $4200.00
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.120 Q03 II
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2005
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.120 Q03 IV
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2005
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.120 Q03 V
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2005
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.120 Q06
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2005
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $4200.00
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2005
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $4200.00
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.1200 H03 II
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2005
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2005
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2005
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2005
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.120 Q03 III
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2005
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $56,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (U) $56000.00
- · Z (W) $70000.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332812)
More inspections in OK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 308059088.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.