Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: NEW-VIEW CLEANING SERVICE, INCORPORATED

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NEW-VIEW CLEANING SERVICE, INCORPORATED in 175 CAMBRIDGE STREET, BOSTON, MA 02114 (NAICS 561790). OSHA activity number 308111160.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch New-View Cleaning Service, Incorporated for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for New-View Cleaning Service, Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
175 CAMBRIDGE STREET
City
BOSTON
State
MA
ZIP
02114
Mailing
10 MICHIGAN DRIVE, NATICK, MA 01760
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561790
SIC code (legacy)
7349
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

2 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2005
Abate by
Jan 12, 2006
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to fall hazards while utilizing a rope descent system
supported from an inadequate
anchorage point:
Location:  175 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA
On 10/24/05, the lifeline was not rigged independently from the
transportable counterweighted
outrigger used for the primary suspension line exposing the employee to
fall hazards of up to
5 stories.  The lifeline and the primary line were tied together in a knot
attaching them both to
the outrigger.  Also, the outrigger was not tied-back to a certified
anchorage on the building.
A feasible abatement method includes, but is not limited to, ensuring that
rope descent systems
and the suspension devices for the rope descent systems are installed and
used in accordance
with ANSI/IWCA I-14.1.CA
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $750.00
  • · Z (S) $1500.00

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2005
Abate by
Jan 12, 2006
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $750.00
  • · Z (S) $1500.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 308111160.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.