Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: KOPPERS INDUSTRIES, INC.

Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of KOPPERS INDUSTRIES, INC. in 2201 EDMONDS, NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR 72117 (NAICS 321114). OSHA activity number 308116755.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Koppers Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Koppers Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2201 EDMONDS
City
NORTH LITTLE ROCK
State
AR
ZIP
72117
Mailing
P.O. BOX 15490, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72231
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Y
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321114
SIC code (legacy)
2491
Employees
90
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 A04

Serious Gravity 03 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2005
Abate by
Jun 20, 2005
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500.00
  • — Z (S) $2500.00

5(a)(1)

Unclassified Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2005
Abate by
May 6, 2005
Penalty
Initial $70,000 · Current $70,000
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized
hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in
that employees were
exposed to:
At the establishment located at 2201 Edmonds, North Little Rock, Arkansas,
employees
were exposed to being struck by moving railcars in the following instances:
(a)On or about November 11, 2004, an employee operating a Kawasaki 80 Z
wheel
loader was using the loader to push four loaded railcars, Nos. UP708969,
UP908894, ADN4003 and ADN4004.  The loader was not connected to the
railcars, therefore had no control over the braking or emergency stopping
of the
free rolling cars, exposing the employee working on the tracks to the
hazards of
being struck by the rail cars.
(b)Prior to November 11, 2004, employees operating wheel loaders routinely
pushed
empty and loaded railcars with the loaders.  The loaders were not
connected to
the railcars, therefore had no control over the braking or emergency
stopping of
the free rolling cars, exposing employees to being struck by the cars while
working on or near the track.
Among other feasible means of abatement, one acceptable method of
abatement is to use
a locomotive to move the rail-cars or a loader with a manufacturer
approved  coupler
attachment.
"Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19(d), the employer must provide documentation
that this
violation has been abated, within ten days after the abatement date.ment
Recent events (2)
  • — I (U) $70000.00
  • — Z (W) $70000.00

5(a)(1)

Unclassified Gravity 10 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2005
Abate by
May 6, 2005
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized
hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in
that employees were
exposed:
At the establishment located at 2201 Edmonds, North Little Rock, Arkansas,
employees
were exposed to being struck by moving railcars in the following instances:
(a)On or about November 11, 2004, an employee operating a  Kawasaki 80 Z
wheel
loader was using the loader to push four loaded rail cars down the track.
The
wheels of the two idle cars on track just to the right of the intersection
were not
chocked nor was the hand brake set to prevent them from rolling when the
two
cars being pushed contacted the idle cars, exposing employees in the path
of
travel to the hazard of being struck by the cars.
(b)Prior to November 11, 2004, employees operating wheel loaders pushed
empty
and loaded railcars with the loaders and employees did not routinely chock
the
wheels of the idle railcars nor did they routinely set the hand brake on
the
cars
left idle, exposing employees in the path of travel to the hazard of being
struck
by the cars.
Among other feasible means of abatement, one acceptable method of
abatement is for the
operator, spotter or brakeman to chock the wheels or apply a hand brake
every time cars
come to a stop and are left idle.
"Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19(d), the employer must provide documentatin
that this
violation has been abated, within ten (10) days after the abatement date."
Recent events (2)
  • — I (U)
  • — Z (W)

5(a)(1)

Unclassified Gravity 10 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2005
Abate by
May 6, 2005
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized
hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in
that employees were
exposed to:
At the establishment located at 2201 Edmonds, North Little Rock, Arkansas,
employees
were exposed to being struck by moving railcars in the following instances:
(a)On or about November 11, 2004, an employee operating a  Kawasaki 80 Z
wheel
loader was using the loader to push four loaded rail cars.  While the
railcars were
being pushed, employees were not assigned as spotters at the lead end of
the cars
being pushed to ensure the track was clear and employees were not exposed
to
the hazards of being struck by the railcars.
(b)Prior to November 11, 2004, employees operating wheel loaders routinely
pushed
empty and loaded railcars without the benefit of a spotter assigned to
ensure the
track was clear and employees were not exposed to being struck by the
oncoming
railcars.
Among other feasible means of abatement, one acceptable method of
abatement
is to use
spotters at the lead end of the cars being pushed to clear the track and
alert employees
of the approaching cars.
"Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19(d), the employer must provide documentation
that this
violation has been abated, within ten (10) days after the abatement
date."ent
Recent events (2)
  • — I (U)
  • — Z (W)

5(a)(1)

Unclassified Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2005
Abate by
Jun 20, 2005
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized
hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in
that employees were
exposed to:
At the establishment located at 2201 Edmonds, North Little Rock, Arkansas,
the
corporate safety program was not vigorously enforced to provide compliance
with safety
and health provisions and standards.  Additionally, the employer did not
continually
instruct employees and management representatives on the recognition and
avoidance
of
unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to their work environment
in order to
control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury
and ensure that all
applicable rules and regulations were followed and enforced by in-house
supervisors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this
hazard is to increase observations of employee and supervisor work
practices and correct
and discipline employees who do not follow safe work practices.
"Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19(d), the employer must provide documentation
that this
violation has been abated, within ten (10) days after the abatement
date."ent
Recent events (2)
  • — I (U)
  • — Z (W)

View Koppers Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 308116755.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.