NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR —
OSHA Inspection: KOPPERS INDUSTRIES, INC.
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of KOPPERS INDUSTRIES, INC. in 2201 EDMONDS, NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR 72117 (NAICS 321114). OSHA activity number 308116755.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KOPPERS INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Site address
- 2201 EDMONDS
- City
- NORTH LITTLE ROCK
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 72117
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 15490, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72231
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321114
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2491
- Employees
- 90
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 A04
- Issued
- May 2, 2005
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 2, 2005
- Abate by
- May 6, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $70,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: At the establishment located at 2201 Edmonds, North Little Rock, Arkansas, employees were exposed to being struck by moving railcars in the following instances: (a)On or about November 11, 2004, an employee operating a Kawasaki 80 Z wheel loader was using the loader to push four loaded railcars, Nos. UP708969, UP908894, ADN4003 and ADN4004. The loader was not connected to the railcars, therefore had no control over the braking or emergency stopping of the free rolling cars, exposing the employee working on the tracks to the hazards of being struck by the rail cars. (b)Prior to November 11, 2004, employees operating wheel loaders routinely pushed empty and loaded railcars with the loaders. The loaders were not connected to the railcars, therefore had no control over the braking or emergency stopping of the free rolling cars, exposing employees to being struck by the cars while working on or near the track. Among other feasible means of abatement, one acceptable method of abatement is to use a locomotive to move the rail-cars or a loader with a manufacturer approved coupler attachment. "Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19(d), the employer must provide documentation that this violation has been abated, within ten days after the abatement date.ment
Recent events (2)
- — I (U) $70000.00
- — Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 2, 2005
- Abate by
- May 6, 2005
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed: At the establishment located at 2201 Edmonds, North Little Rock, Arkansas, employees were exposed to being struck by moving railcars in the following instances: (a)On or about November 11, 2004, an employee operating a Kawasaki 80 Z wheel loader was using the loader to push four loaded rail cars down the track. The wheels of the two idle cars on track just to the right of the intersection were not chocked nor was the hand brake set to prevent them from rolling when the two cars being pushed contacted the idle cars, exposing employees in the path of travel to the hazard of being struck by the cars. (b)Prior to November 11, 2004, employees operating wheel loaders pushed empty and loaded railcars with the loaders and employees did not routinely chock the wheels of the idle railcars nor did they routinely set the hand brake on the cars left idle, exposing employees in the path of travel to the hazard of being struck by the cars. Among other feasible means of abatement, one acceptable method of abatement is for the operator, spotter or brakeman to chock the wheels or apply a hand brake every time cars come to a stop and are left idle. "Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19(d), the employer must provide documentatin that this violation has been abated, within ten (10) days after the abatement date."
Recent events (2)
- — I (U)
- — Z (W)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 2, 2005
- Abate by
- May 6, 2005
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: At the establishment located at 2201 Edmonds, North Little Rock, Arkansas, employees were exposed to being struck by moving railcars in the following instances: (a)On or about November 11, 2004, an employee operating a Kawasaki 80 Z wheel loader was using the loader to push four loaded rail cars. While the railcars were being pushed, employees were not assigned as spotters at the lead end of the cars being pushed to ensure the track was clear and employees were not exposed to the hazards of being struck by the railcars. (b)Prior to November 11, 2004, employees operating wheel loaders routinely pushed empty and loaded railcars without the benefit of a spotter assigned to ensure the track was clear and employees were not exposed to being struck by the oncoming railcars. Among other feasible means of abatement, one acceptable method of abatement is to use spotters at the lead end of the cars being pushed to clear the track and alert employees of the approaching cars. "Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19(d), the employer must provide documentation that this violation has been abated, within ten (10) days after the abatement date."ent
Recent events (2)
- — I (U)
- — Z (W)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 2, 2005
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2005
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: At the establishment located at 2201 Edmonds, North Little Rock, Arkansas, the corporate safety program was not vigorously enforced to provide compliance with safety and health provisions and standards. Additionally, the employer did not continually instruct employees and management representatives on the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to their work environment in order to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury and ensure that all applicable rules and regulations were followed and enforced by in-house supervisors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to increase observations of employee and supervisor work practices and correct and discipline employees who do not follow safe work practices. "Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19(d), the employer must provide documentation that this violation has been abated, within ten (10) days after the abatement date."ent
Recent events (2)
- — I (U)
- — Z (W)
More inspections at Koppers Industries, INC.
View Koppers Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321114)
More inspections in AR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 308116755.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.